Wow, things are hopping in Victoria. 2nd tier stations abound. 1593 nice
and strong at 15:17 UTC, for example. 1566 is very powerful, too. Like a
local. Nice to see for this time of the year! Seems to be favouring the
upper half of the band. No sign of DU, though. All Asia. 73,...Walt
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Richard N Allen <richarda@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> TP reception was a bit better here this morning (LSR 1315 GMT).
> 567 JOIK barely audible at 1242.
> 594 JOAK only a trace, no audio, at 1238, nothing later.
> 657 Pyongyang? traces of a signal at 1245, no audio.
> 693 JOAB barely audible woman talking at 1235.
> 702 unID carrier at 1309.
> 747 JOIB barely audible at 1307.
> 774 JOUB poor-to-fair at 1132-1141; barely audible with TS at 1200; barely
> audible at 1226.
> 828 JOBB? het in WCCO & unID XE slop at 1303.
> 972 HLCA? weak het at 1231 and 1301.
> 1053 traces of signal at 1258.
> 1566 HLAZ barely audible at 1314-1318; sometimes peaking to fair in severe
> XERF-1570 slop at 1320-1334; finally fading away 20 minutes past sunrise.
> 1593 CNR1? traces of a signal at 1318.
>
> 3925 Nikkei 2 fair at 1346, severe ham band QRM later.
>
> Last evening I heard LW signals from across the Atlantic on 162, 182, 189
> and 252 kHz.
>
> Richard Allen,
> near Perry OK USA,
> PL-380 + 8-inch FSL,
> WR-G313e + ALA1530LNP.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx