[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] IRCA Loop update
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] IRCA Loop update
- From: "Brent Taylor" <btaylor@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 07:28:53 -0400
- Thread-index: AcXmrDsWQ73NYUVcQsWQX9n2d4IybQABgEeg
Well, the outer diameter of a conductor is really what gives it the capacity
to handle current, due to the "skin effect." I wonder if the collective
outer diameter surface area of Craig's cooper pipe loop is sufficient to
overcome the collective outer diameter surface area of all of the wires in a
wire loop. Mathematically I can see how it could be the case. Maybe the RF
capture success is directly related to the surface area of the antenna.
The ability to conduct current, and the ability to snag microvolts from the
ether, are undoubtedly related in some way. To take maximum advantage of
surface area, maybe we could DX with a big brass sphere behind a curved,
rotatable "nulling" shield.
Get on that, Craig!
Brent Taylor, VE1JH
Doaktown, NB FN66
6M VUCC #418, AMSAT #33576
> -----Original Message-----
> From: irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stephen Hawkins
> Sent: November 11, 2005 6:38 AM
> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] IRCA Loop update
> I am very puzzled by this. It seems to me that a copper
> tubing loop would just look like a very thick piece of wire
<snip>
>
> Does anyone have any thoughts that might shed some light on this.
>
> Steve
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx