[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] DX conditions 9/26
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] DX conditions 9/26
- From: "Neil Kazaross" <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:21:00 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=ZUqkmyAUb2PLAjJVM9JLAotuqDU0lUQUaFmToq82vYQOkfmdJho1FZeSvDi9Tpa3; h=Received:Message-ID:Reply-To:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Which one of these two from CH gets out the best ? Here in IL I need
extremely good northern Mexico cx to get any of these thru IA/OK etc and
have only IDed Parral.
73 KAZ
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Gleason" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America'"
<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 3:16 PM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] DX conditions 9/26
> Oops. I saw Vacaville somewhere.
>
> In Prescott Valley, the two stations are definitely Juarez and Parral.
>
> At least that is what I get at my (under construction) place at
> Hassayampa.
> David.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx