Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] More IBOC In Philly
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] More IBOC In Philly



>..the way the digital signal is constructed makes it "appear" to have more
>power, and, because it is digital, it will cover in usable fashion as much
>and sometimes more usable geography than AM. At KTNQ we have found that the
>IBOC signal is usable in a number of areas where the analog signal is
>overcome by objectionable noise or interference. 

I would agree that analog and digital coverage may well equal out for the normal listener.  DXers will put up with a lot more degradation of the signal than the average CUME denizen.

When I was listening to WOR on the Kenwood HD Radio, the analog was perfectly listenable to me.  If there was noise, I couldn't notice it.  The digital just wouldn't decode.  Again, I'd guess WOR has maybe .1-.3mv/m over Providence.  Way outside their Sphere of Influence.

The jury on the usefulness to DXers of HD Radio isn't even chosen yet, let alone deliberating.

Craig Healy
Providence, RI




_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx