Re: [IRCA] IBOC DXing

["Bill Harms" <wharms@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

David:

That could be true for an individual station that itself is not 
suffering from sidebend IBOC interference.  The real test would be 
how would stations fair in an environment crowded with IBOC signals. 
Mr'. Ray's testing notwithstanding, there has not been enough testing 
to determine the extent of this problem.

Bill Harms

On 18 Sep 2005 at 14:20, David Gleason wrote:

> Some of us have measured the useful coverage of the digital AM signal
> vs. the HD signal. In markets with high noise, like LA and NY, the HD
> signal is usable at greater distances than the analog signal. Similar
> testing by Tom Ray at WOR have born out the finding that stations can
> increase their interference free coverage with HD. 


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx