Re: [IRCA] [AMFMTVDX] Should Skywave Listening be protected?

["Duane B. Fischer, W8DBF" <dfischer@xxxxxxxx>]

Bill, 	
	
For the benefit of younger subscribers, you might explain what 'skywave
listening' used to be all about. It may be only a radio tern or unclear concept
for many of them. The same as groundwave propagation, grayline propagation etc.	
	
Duane W8DBF	
 

 ----------
From: Bill Harms <wharms@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: amfmtvdx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; nRC List <am@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
glenn Hauser <wghauser@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [AMFMTVDX] Should Skywave Listening be protected?
Date: Thursday, May 12, 2005 3:44 PM

This is from article appearing at
http://www.rwonline.com/reference-room/special-
report/06_rw_oninionjuly1.shtml

"Those who want to improve their AM signals with IBOC believe that protecting 
skywave listening is not as important now as it was years ago, when far fewer 
stations existed and rural areas in particular were underserved by media."

Question for debate: Is IBOC worth the sacrifice of skywave listening because 
skywave listening is no longer as important as it was in the past?

Bill Harms
Elkridge, Maryland.
______________________________________________________________
AMFMTVDX mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amfmtvdx
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMFMTVDX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx