[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Swprograms] FW: World Service Feedback
- Subject: Re: [Swprograms] FW: World Service Feedback
- From: Richard Cuff <rdcuff@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:30:51 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=BL5G5fWSiVuBlBStGIe0fqZcPl9ttWlf60zDogSwDP8P/hw5jMboTMYlEcXJA+BSZwSIBmrlUAVQzURGH/mfGNo5sDQBtAEoTWxJqX50IrbtXV4iq8GH8izNaIGb9/7UduViSbXHCJX8/uLCOigSMFNQONNNdtdsW32gsSZM0tI=
I consider myself a "serious SWL". Not a DXer. For me the Sony 2010
is a fine radio. For that matter, most of the time, a Yacht Boy 400
or a Sony 7600-GR would also be fine.
I do not begrudge anyone who has an R8 -- I've used them, and they're
great radios with capabilities to dig signals out of muck that the
'2010 couldn't do. I'd love to have one if someone gave one to me!
Rich Cuff / Allentown, PA USA
On Apr 11, 2005 10:16 PM, Scott Royall <royall@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It is, for serious SWLs
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: swprograms-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:swprograms-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Figliozzi
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 9:06 PM
> To: Shortwave programming discussion
> Subject: Re: [Swprograms] FW: World Service Feedback
>
> Not precisely on point, though. Those receivers are not of the type a
> "regular listener" would use. They're hobbyist, maybe
> semi-professional receivers. Not what would be commonly termed
> "consumer radios".
_______________________________________________
Swprograms mailing list
Swprograms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms
To unsubscribe: Send an E-mail to swprograms-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the URL shown above.