[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Swprograms] Sanford Unger on the VOA's Status
- Subject: [Swprograms] Sanford Unger on the VOA's Status
- From: John Figliozzi <jfiglio1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 22:25:46 -0500
An excerpt from an excellent and informative article titled "Pitch
Imperfect" in Foreign Affairs quarterly by former VOA Director Sanford
Unger (also earlier, of NPR's All Things Considered) on the
increasingly dire status of the VOA.
John Figliozzi
Halfmoon, NY
-------------------------
"The Voice of America -- the United States' best tool of public
diplomacy -- is being subjected to systematic cutbacks, even as the
country's international image is suffering. Washington must reverse the
trend or face even greater hostility abroad...."
"...Unfortunately, the VOA is unlikely to get much support from anyone
else in Washington. For all the admiration it enjoys overseas, the
network has virtually no constituency inside the United States. The
prohibition on its broadcasting at home has guaranteed that few, if
any, members of Congress have ever heard a VOA program (even though
they are now available at www.voanews.com). Most are unaware that VOA
headquarters, complete with giant rooftop satellite dishes, sit a few
blocks away from the principal office building of the House of
Representatives. Votes on appropriations for the network are rarely
noticed, let alone tracked, and they never affect a member of Congress'
prospects for reelection. A few influential members of both houses
have, in fact, made a particular effort to cut funding for the VOA,
which they insist is an expensive relic of the Cold War.
"Oblivious to irony, some prefer to bolster Radio Liberty (RL), Radio
Free Europe (RFE), and Radio Free Asia (RFA), stations created to
report domestic news in countries where, because of communism, no
independent national broadcasters could. The distinction between these
networks and the VOA may seem subtle to the casual observer, but it is
real: whereas the VOA was intended as an international news source, RL
and RFE were established by the CIA during the Cold War to counter
communist propaganda in the Soviet Union and its satellite states,
respectively, and RFA, the brainchild of Senator Joseph Biden (D-Del.),
was launched in 1996 to do the same in Asia. (None of these networks
receives funding from the intelligence budget today, and none is
officially part of the U.S. government, allowing them greater
flexibility than the VOA has in hiring and firing staff.) Capitol Hill
has even greater affection for the anti-Fidel Castro stations Radio
MartÌ and TV MartÌ, even though Radio MartÌ is believed to have fewer
listeners in Cuba than the Spanish service of the VOA and TV MartÌ has
almost no audience, except at the American Interests Section in Havana
and on a few Latin American cable channels. The Office of Cuba
Broadcasting, which coordinates programming for the two stations, is
the rare recipient of "no-year money," federal funds it can hold over
indefinitely, and it usually gets more such funding than it can spend.
(The Bush administration's budget for fiscal year 2006 includes a
request for $10 million to acquire and operate an airborne transmitter
that could supposedly evade Cuban jamming of TV MartÌ's signal.)
"Some might argue that as a government-funded network, the VOA should
be expected always to portray U.S. policies as righteous and
successful; they might even claim that, in the right hands, such
propaganda could help defuse anti-Americanism abroad. But experience
demonstrates that the VOA is most appreciated and effective when it
functions as a model U.S.-style news organization that presents a
balanced view of domestic and international events, setting an example
for how independent journalism can strengthen democracy. After all,
these are the values that the network's charter sought to enshrine, and
they are no less important today than before. Many still believe that
the VOA delivered its finest performances in the midst of severe crises
such as the Watergate scandal and the impeachment proceedings against
President Bill Clinton, when it gave full and balanced accounts of the
news.
"The network still has a critical role to play in introducing American
values to the rest of the world. It is no coincidence that in recent
years some of the VOA's largest audiences have been in Afghanistan,
Bangladesh, Nigeria, and Tanzania -- countries where the local media
simply cannot be trusted to offer an accurate representation of what is
happening domestically or around the world. It also is telling that,
like the Soviets a few decades ago, the governments of Iran and North
Korea now spend considerable effort trying to jam VOA broadcasts.
Ironically, by taking English off some of the clearest shortwave
frequencies, the BBG has rendered a certain amount of jamming
unnecessary.
"Some members of Congress have suggested that the VOA's job might best
be left to the free market and cable services such as Fox and CNN,
which have extensive networks of correspondents. But it is impossible
to imagine these commercial operations mounting the effort and
shouldering the expense necessary to provide, for both the radio and
the Internet, in-depth international news in Burmese, Hausa,
Macedonian, Swahili, or others of the 44 languages in which the VOA
currently broadcasts. With an annual budget of approximately $150
million, almost 100 million listeners worldwide every week, and
increasing penetration in difficult regions thanks to both fm signals
and shortwave frequencies, the VOA is still an astonishing bargain for
the U.S. taxpayer. When the U.S. government hopes to open up channels
of information in countries facing political or social crises, such as
Indonesia or Zimbabwe, it first turns to the VOA to add broadcast
hours. If those programs succeed in breaking through domestic barriers
to the free flow of information, it is because they carry the VOA label
and greater credibility than political speeches or flat declarations of
U.S. policy..."
_______________________________________________
Swprograms mailing list
Swprograms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms
To unsubscribe: Send an E-mail to swprograms-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the URL shown above.