RE: [Swprograms] RCI Reception Problems

["Sandy Finlayson" <SFinlayson@xxxxxxx>]

Hasn't RCI used frequencies in the 5900's before.  Perhaps moving that bit lower would help.

I just can't figure out why they would choose to use times and frequencies that can't be heard on the east coast of the USA.

Sandy

-----Original Message-----
From: swprograms-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:swprograms-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Ricky Leong
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 12:54 PM
To: SW Programs
Subject: Re: [Swprograms] RCI Reception Problems


Glenn Hauser wrote:

> Unless RCI could manage
> a frequency on 90, 75, or 60 meters, 49m is the best they can do for close-in
> coverage.

What prevents RCI from using anything lower than 6 MHz? Is the challenge 
technological (i.e. antenna)?

> It would certainly help if they still had a broadcast earlier in the
> evening/afternoon, or used southerly relay sites!

Now that would be too good -- so it probably won't happen. (Ah, bureaucracy.)

Ricky
_______________________________________________
Swprograms mailing list
Swprograms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms

To unsubscribe:  Send an E-mail to  swprograms-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the URL shown above.


_______________________________________________
Swprograms mailing list
Swprograms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms

To unsubscribe:  Send an E-mail to  swprograms-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the URL shown above.