Re: [Swprograms] A washingtonpost.com article from: richard@thecuffs.us

["Richard Cuff" <richard@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I should add that the quote was from a consultant to Sirius, Walter
Sabo...not the Post author.

Richard Cuff / Allentown, PA  USA


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <richard@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <swprograms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 4:07 PM
Subject: [Swprograms] A washingtonpost.com article from: richard@xxxxxxxxxxx


You have been sent this message from richard@xxxxxxxxxxx as a courtesy of
washingtonpost.com

 Personal Message:
 Hmm.  A quote from this article:  "This has the potential to turn FM into
AM and AM into shortwave."

Does this mean that AM radio will finally be worth listening to?

Richard Cuff / Allentown, PA  US

 Stern's Move to Satellite Radio Is a Signal Event

 By Frank Ahrens

  Though Howard Stern's defection from broadcast to satellite radio is still
16 months off, the industry is already trying to figure out what will fill
the crater in ad revenue and listenership that he is expected to leave
behind.

 Stern -- who has about 12 million listeners a day -- has been one of the
radio's top earners for several years. He is responsible for about $100
million in annual ad revenue for his syndicator, Infinity Broadcasting,
owned by media giant Viacom Inc.

 In January 2006, he plans to take that revenue machine, and probably many
listeners, to Sirius Satellite Radio, where his often raunchy show won't be
constrained by the decency standards of the Federal Communications
Commission.

 Some radio executives counseled calm yesterday, saying that although Stern
is talented, Viacom has the resources to replace him.

 "What did it mean to late-night TV when Johnny Carson left?" said David J.
Field, chief executive of Entercom Communications Corp., which owns 100
radio stations. "The reality is, that was not the demise of late-night TV."

 But others said the AM and FM industry will be hit hard, not only because
of the loss of one of its most popular broadcasters, but also because AM and
FM are at a perilous point.

 The nation's two satellite radio companies, XM and Sirius, have about 3.1
million paid subscribers between them. They charge $9.95 and $12.95 a month
for access to more than 100 largely commercial-free stations on special
receivers that cost around $150.

  The Stern deal, according to one of its architects, could transform the
industry.

 "This deal has the potential to turn FM into AM and AM into shortwave,"
said Walter Sabo, president of Sabo Media and a consultant to Sirius. Sabo
was a member of the Sirius team that lured Stern.

 Sabo compares AM and FM vs. satellite today to AM vs. FM 30 years ago.

 Until the late 1960s, AM was king and FM was a backwater. Station owners
who had both AM and FM signals put their high-profile deejays and music on
the AM stations and used the FM signals for brokered programming -- selling
time to advertisers -- or simply handed them over to youthful underground
deejays to play music. FM was not considered a viable revenue-maker and
station owners largely ignored them.

 But rock music started sounding better. On AM, Jimi Hendrix was tinny. On
static-free FM, he was a revelation. Young listeners began streaming to FM
stations and owners realized they could be profitable.

 Owners of AM stations, satisfied with their profits, were afraid to take
the risks necessary to compete with the growing FM industry. Eventually,
almost all music left AM for FM. AM stations struggled until the '80s, when
Rush Limbaugh's show caught on and AM stations thrived with talk formats.

 Now, Sabo said, many of the top FM stations are constrained by the same
mentality, because of the quarterly profit demands of the publicly traded
companies that own them. He said that when he pitched a new radio format
aimed at young women, a demographic that forms the backbone of successful
daytime television shows, "I couldn't get one [radio executive] to put it
on."

 At the annual radio show held by the National Association of Broadcasters
in San Diego, radio consultant Holland Cooke said Stern's move is Topic A.

 "We want to think [satellite radio] will never catch on and Stern's going
to fall off the map," Cooke said. "There's a tremendous comfort in the radio
establishment in dissing this, but there is a dazed look in the eyes of the
enlightened with whom I've spoken here."

 Cooke said Stern's move to satellite radio is only a symptom of a larger
problem: "Radio is losing content to new media," he said.

 A Clear Channel Communications Corp. radio station program director, who
declined to be quoted by name because Clear Channel is in a legal dispute
with Stern over the company's decision to take his show off of six Clear
Channel stations in February, said: "I have never witnessed anything as
cataclysmic as this. This is a wake-up call to everyone in [AM and FM]
radio."

 Most troubling about Stern's exit from traditional radio is his desire to
escape FCC scrutiny, the Clear Channel program director said. If a talented
young personality wants to do a radio show but doesn't want to deal with the
FCC, he or she could take the show to satellite radio rather than to AM or
FM, much in the way that many television producers and directors have chosen
HBO and Showtime instead of broadcast networks, which face FCC scrutiny, the
program director said.

 Jeffrey H. Smulyan, chief executive of Emmis Communications, which owns 27
U.S. radio stations, said Stern's departure to satellite radio "is probably
the best resolution to the situation," given the likelihood that Infinity
would continue to rack up FCC fines while he stays in its employ.

 However, even if both Sirius and XM satellite radio hit "their wildest
dreams" of total subscribers -- 40 million -- "295 million people will still
be listening exclusively" to AM and FM radio, Smulyan said.



 Would you like to send this article to a friend? Go to
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/admin/emailfriend?contentId=A16113-2004Oct7&sent=no&referrer=emailarticle



Visit washingtonpost.com today for the latest in:

News - http://www.washingtonpost.com/?referrer=emailarticle

Politics -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/politics/?referrer=emailarticle

Sports - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/sports/?referrer=emailarticle

Entertainment -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/artsandliving/entertainmentguide/?referrer=emailarticle

Travel - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/travel/?referrer=emailarticle

Technology -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/technology/?referrer=emailarticle




Want the latest news in your inbox? Check out washingtonpost.com's e-mail
newsletters:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?node=admin/email&referrer=emailarticle



© 2004 The Washington Post Company


_______________________________________________
Swprograms mailing list
Swprograms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms

To unsubscribe:  Send an E-mail to
swprograms-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the URL
shown above.

_______________________________________________
Swprograms mailing list
Swprograms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms

To unsubscribe:  Send an E-mail to  swprograms-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the URL shown above.