[Swlfest] Re: RX321 (thread name changed)

[Thomas Sundstrom <trscons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wednesday, March 9, 2005, at 04:09  PM, Richard Cuff wrote:

> We will be raffling the D320 as a prize FYI -- what sort of cables 
> should we
> have to demonstrate it?
>
> Richard C
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Phillips (US)" <Mark.Phillips@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "'Discussion list for the Winter SWL Fest'" 
> <swlfest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 3:57 PM
> Subject: [Swlfest] RX321 (thread name changed)
>
>> The RX321 has some improvements over the 320. Its rejection is a few 
>> DB's
>> better, it has a SO239 instead of a phono for the antenna.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mike Wolfson [mailto:mwolfson@xxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 2:13 PM
>> To: Discussion list for the Winter SWL Fest
>> Subject: [Swlfest] Re: Urgent request -- audio support for Fest
>>
>>
>> Is the 321 a follow on to the Ten-Tec 320 ?
>>
>> Mike

Actually the more interesting question is did Ten-Tec put band pass 
filters in the -321, instead of the roll-off filters, to keep the 
sensitivity up once you tuned below 2 MHz? Despite specs to the 
contrary, the -320 was deaf on MW and LW even on a 300-ft inverted-L. 
The design engineers didn't want high-powered local MW stns dancing 
through the -320. And I suppose it would be too much to ask for 
software support for the Mac... :-)

---
Thomas R. Sundstrom - TRS Consultants
Contributing Editor, Media Network, Radio Netherlands
Webmaster, WWCR Nashville
Editorial Staff, Monitoring Times
XML/RSS-get RSS feed of latest news:  trsc.com/rss.xml
trsc.com - sundstrom.org - w2xq.com - swlfest.com

_______________________________________________
Swlfest mailing list
Swlfest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/swlfest