[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] All-Digital AM Co-Channel Lab Test Results Unveiled
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] All-Digital AM Co-Channel Lab Test Results Unveiled
- From: Russ Edmunds <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 16:54:24 -0400
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=TmcArOzq/NBmsHXxbu+oA0CWTa2wkD4G1t4uhXWGsuk=; b=qWH5x/5bka6E1HcWmId3xQSi6/0kTNIbQWzE5GUeFHdxtOKWTxambhvaB5hA0PnQX4 BqCj9t3ycZsm/TA/QE28DcGf8ibQ1sKzST/qDIGi+Nfpe8+VHQ1U005o87pLZQX4SHO5 ozizFyawZRgq7l+vHu3dHPazbemrDGc2JA3e9m+v5FC50jkuJ3BN/uNvtoiJuF8LucQP KlF0uwLLL/bEGX6vhonrmqj4uTfKfmOKmbKyrudFkZePswEr50Yv1NtfS3YdApnJpTCA iXc5DIKwkcf4quywFGbHQi/p3Y0lIX8+4ZFizUwXJJXm4Mt4SBOu4qNfen2hHNqmd6CS i1GQ==
I would anticipate that the larger potential interference problems will be
when stations on the same channel are some digital and some analog,
but the interference, I strongly suspect would be from the analog
interfering with the digital due to the wider bandwidth and/or propagation.
Russ Edmunds
15 mi NW Phila
Grid FN20id
<wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
AM: Modified Sony ICF2010's (2) barefoot w/whip
FM: Yamaha T-80 & T-85, each w/ Conrad RDS Decoder;
Onkyo T-450RDS; Tecsun PL-310 ( 2);
modified Sony ICF2010 w/APS9B @ 15';
Grundig G8 w/whip; modified Sony ICF2010 w/whip
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Chuck Hutton <charlesh3@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> You can bet on that, as it would be impossible for each and every station
> to switch over at the same time.
> If the FCC mandates a switch to all digital, there would need to be a long
> time period for that to occur to allow transmission equipment equipment to
> be available, stations to buy the equipment as money is available,
> engineers to install and test the system, all sorts of sonsumer receivers
> to become available and for the public to buy receivers.
> If the FCC didn't mandate a switch and left it to market forces, expect
> the transition to never be complete.
>
> Chuck
> ________________________________________
> From: IRCA <irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Russ Edmunds <
> wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 10:44 AM
> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] All-Digital AM Co-Channel Lab Test Results Unveiled
>
> If the intent were for all stations to go digital, then such a test would
> be meaningless; this suggests therefore that there is contemplation of
> mixing all digital with analog all within the AM band ??
>
> Russ Edmunds
> 15 mi NW Phila
> Grid FN20id
> <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> AM: Modified Sony ICF2010's (2) barefoot w/whip
> FM: Yamaha T-80 & T-85, each w/ Conrad RDS Decoder;
> Onkyo T-450RDS; Tecsun PL-310 ( 2);
> modified Sony ICF2010 w/APS9B @ 15';
> Grundig G8 w/whip; modified Sony ICF2010 w/whip
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 1:03 AM, Chuck Hutton <charlesh3@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Yes, desired to undesired is often-used nomenclature in the
> communications
> > world.
> >
> > I don't see how you can correlate hybrid IBOC to all digital IBOC. What
> > you hear with KRKO/KAST is different from what you will hear
> > with all digital as the power spectrum and subcarrier levels are vastly
> > different.
> >
> > Chuck
> > ________________________________________
> > From: IRCA <irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Nick Hall-Patch
> <
> > nhp@xxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 4:51 AM
> > To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
> > Subject: Re: [IRCA] All-Digital AM Co-Channel Lab Test Results Unveiled
> >
> > I presume "D/U" abbreviation in this piece refers to "desired /
> undesired"?
> >
> > I wonder if someone recorded audio from those tests, rather than just
> > tossing dB's around? I have a recording of KAST-1370 from this
> > morning that says otherwise, with KRKO-1380 IBOC sidebands about 25dB
> > down and....welll, KAST is readable, but I wouldn't say it's lacking
> > interference. The noise becomes really dominant if KAST is less
> > than ~15dB above the IBOC level.
> >
> > best wishes,
> >
> > Nick
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > At 21:05 21-04-16, you wrote:
> > >
> >
> http://www.radioworld.com/article/all-digital-am-co-channel-lab-test-results-unveiled/278670
> > >
> > >Sent from my iPad
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >IRCA mailing list
> > >IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > >
> > >Be sure to register now for the Joint DX Convention
> > >Kansas City, September 9 to 11. Hotel space is filling up.
> > >Registration info:
> > >http://www.nrcdxas.org
> > >
> > >
> > >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > >original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
> > >the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > >
> > >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > >
> > >To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Be sure to register now for the Joint DX Convention
> > Kansas City, September 9 to 11. Hotel space is filling up.
> > Registration info:
> > http://www.nrcdxas.org
> >
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Be sure to register now for the Joint DX Convention
> > Kansas City, September 9 to 11. Hotel space is filling up.
> > Registration info:
> > http://www.nrcdxas.org
> >
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Be sure to register now for the Joint DX Convention
> Kansas City, September 9 to 11. Hotel space is filling up.
> Registration info:
> http://www.nrcdxas.org
>
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Be sure to register now for the Joint DX Convention
> Kansas City, September 9 to 11. Hotel space is filling up.
> Registration info:
> http://www.nrcdxas.org
>
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Be sure to register now for the Joint DX Convention
Kansas City, September 9 to 11. Hotel space is filling up.
Registration info:
http://www.nrcdxas.org
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx