[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Fwd: Topband: FCC Map of Ground Conductivity in US
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Fwd: Topband: FCC Map of Ground Conductivity in US
- From: Russ Edmunds <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 09:18:10 -0500
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=RY9dM1OqvVVev9qiuW5OVg4ujMxSFw9jLSilGv539hs=; b=NCJZ33UxiTM6GOGeU5t24Iw5z1qcg9bOlBmgQBq3jSFVq7GdODiZ6rE8OuMX8GA47q ikJWdmpuSuSNQBsk/GamxTBCtNSP2mF0vMOaCO+gk5Bd24So8Khvr2OZz+eoCWhIjDia rO+pciVZrMwEgmY/A8jPBzQeSAKT73I0auWTSh2nmJnB6/T4QfetgPY0D/MWWSqNXipe +80FyTPtZsiu2kpg/Zott8slm/zmIm3XAY5F1yWId+X4vOb+lLsgnJ82z1Gbts+hDqXG 62fhOPi62Y7KiPdxlQJdMrmA+87HEtQwUs02YzplWxTTw3pVbqwRZexqoY/zxxCPXQqJ 8A7w==
Ground conductivity should remain reasonably constant with the exception of
changes caused by severe or massive grological or weather events, so I
wouldn't expect to see much difference.
Russ Edmunds
15 mi NW Phila
Grid FN20id
<wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
AM: Modified Sony ICF2010's (2) barefoot w/whip
FM: Yamaha T-80 & T-85, each w/ Conrad RDS Decoder;
Onkyo T-450RDS; Tecsun PL-310 ( 2);
modified Sony ICF2010 w/APS9B @ 15';
Grundig G8 w/whip; modified Sony ICF2010 w/whip
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 2:27 AM, Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That one is quite up to date, Dennis, 1954. Hard to tell what the one on
> the FCC site is, but I guess it's something that doesn't change much with
> time.
>
> Note that the Alaska and Hawaii ones are labeled "assumed ground
> conductivities"
>
> At 07:15 30-01-16, you wrote:
>
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_conductivity#/media/File:United_States_Effective_Ground_Conductivity_Map.png
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> > On Jan 29, 2016, at 11:05 PM, Bruce Portzer <bportzer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Nick
>> >
>> > I'm not sure where the data came from but it goes back a few years. I
>> have a similar FCC map dated 1938.
>> >
>> > Bruce
>> >
>> >> On 1/29/2016 9:53 PM, Nick Hall-Patch wrote:
>> >> Just in case you have a wall that is bare and just begging for nerdish
>> covering, behold, the FCC offers a printable 43x69-inch map (in many
>> sheets) of ground conductivity in the US (info from Topband Reflector; see
>> below). There is also a text file of ground conductivities for the
>> western hemisphere, including such hot beds of DX as Gabriola Island and
>> Mayne Island. I haven't quite figured out what all the numbers and
>> locations mean however, or where the data originates. Does anyone know?
>> >>
>> >> best wishes,
>> >>
>> >> Nick
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> From:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> http://www.radiomagonline.com/fcc/0019/fcc-reveals-m3-map-of-ground-conductivity-in-us/37366
>> >>> [1]
>> >>>
>> >>> FCC M3 Map of Ground Conductivity in US
>> >>>
>> >>> Commission offering printable 43x69-inch map
>> >>>
>> >>> January 28, 2016
>> >>>
>> >>> The map shows that ground conductivity across the U.S. ranges
>> from
>> >>> 0.5 to 30 millimhos (or millisiemens) per meter. The FCC also reports
>> >>> that the conductivity of seawater is 5,000 millimhos per meter.
>> >>>
>> >>> The downloadable map comes in 48 portions that can be printed.
>> >>>
>> >>> https://www.fcc.gov/media/radio/m3-ground-conductivity-map [2]
>> >>>
>> >>> The FCC is also offering the conductivity data as text files
>> and also
>> >>> includes data for the Chesapeake Bay and Puget Sound, which is not
>> >>> shown on the printable map.
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > IRCA mailing list
>> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>> >
>> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>> >
>> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>> >
>> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx