[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] 621
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] 621
- From: "Paul B. Walker, Jr." <walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 08:26:48 -0900
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Kv1YtnK8Kct3CXDyEQR66r6EGqa+H8Mce9kMwCNUNDQ=; b=guWbK/QFY99pmkbO8tsTBMHsa8zEB+4vai1iYHAhD9TWzBk205BvdJ/cweivZFNtNs xNB4P2LgG873MNhn9aDaeGiBc16zrJP0492CoNNxiADWV8ChGQQE1bmkch2GGjEgKXl/ e4O9kHQ7K6ip/LEerjXDo6Vsnea+D22dO+NLBjD62OfnVAmixxCkcu1McqaUY12D5vw7 sFG7OTV6kahrQCGchIDaUE27qr/Nu0erDTq4II/2vrN1QNH5816NGr8Xq2svvR1qAyUO t+jsOz+FK0J2Cv55TE01srPrdz4ul+EWvLb8POparBGMG27kVh3e7lAaNOdEz4MzSWpI zHIg==
Colin. One would think if I could get away from the noise, I could
possibly hear 621 even better. I'm 300 miles from any am transmitter and a
bit closer to Tuvalu then you folks.
Paul
On Monday, January 25, 2016, R. Colin Newell <coffeecanuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Good for Nick and Walt for snagging some audio --
>
> I was doing some other chores and did not think anything of the het on 621.
>
> This is a classic example of never watching a frequency closely because you
> are not expecting
> anything.
>
> Diligence is the key!
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > I'd say it's even at fair level now (621). Get rid of the 620 hash, and
> it
> > would be quite listenable. Still the same YL talking. Now 07:13 UTC
> > Walt Salmaniw, Victoria, BC
> >
> >
> --
> Colin Newell - Editor and creator *of *Coffeecrew.com
> <http://www.Coffeecrew.com> and DXer.ca <http://www.DXer.ca> -
> VA7WWV | Twitter @CoffeeCrew | Victoria - Canada
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx