[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] DX Season
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] DX Season
- From: Chuck Hutton <charlesh3@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 02:27:32 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: hard-core-dx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; hard-core-dx.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=msn.com;
- Content-language: en-US
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
- Thread-index: AQHRRWnigd7Mu3Hv90GGEKleTP7+ap7ogp+AgAALPW6AADyo0IAARwIe
- Thread-topic: [IRCA] DX Season
Everything you say is way true, Nick.... but out of scope from the original post!
Chuck
________________________________________
From: IRCA <irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, January 2, 2016 10:12 PM
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
Subject: Re: [IRCA] DX Season
And you would be correct Chuck. On the coast, with the water
lapping at your feet, and the next stop being New Zealand. I
suspect that will not generalize well to the rest of the Pacific NW.
The comparison of the New Zealanders heard at Grayland or Rockworks
in late June with what was heard even in Victoria (a bit of a water
path over Juan de Fuca Strait) in the weeks before or after would be
a good illustration for those who cared to look on the IRCA list for
those weeks. The New Zealanders heard in Seattle during that time
period could apparently be counted on the fingers of one foot.
A similar comparison for Asiatics in October between the coast and
inland is obviously dissimilar in quantity of stations and of signal
strength, but no one is surprised to hear Japan, Korea or China in
Seattle at that time, with no Beverage or DKaz antennas harmed during
the process. Power is generally higher for Asian stations of course,
and they are closer than New Zealand to the Pacific NW, but in
comparing receptions here of Japan and New Zealand on 567 for
example, there does seem to be more in play than just 3dB more power
and 4500 km distance, especially given the former has several hundred
kilometers of mountainous rock to pass before it arrives at my
antenna while the latter has a couple of kilometers.
best wishes,
Nick
At 18:42 02-01-16, you wrote:
>Were I to read this without any other information, I'd think May to
>August was dead in the Pacific NW except for a month of "better" NZ.
>As I see it, that time period is not just "better", it is very good.
>And it's not just NZ: it is also Australia and the Pacific Islands.
>
>Chuck
>
>________________________________________
>From: IRCA <irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Nick
>Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Saturday, January 2, 2016 5:55 PM
>To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America; DX @NRC; MNDXC
>Subject: Re: [IRCA] DX Season
>
>(CLIP)
>
>On the west coast, atmospheric noise levels don't increase markedly
>during the summer months, but of course, northerly overseas paths
>mostly disappear for a month or two around summer solstice,
>compensated for by better reception from New Zealand.
>
>(CLIP)
>
>Nick
>
>
>At 14:28 02-01-16, Mark Durenberger wrote:
> >I know...YMMV on this one...but would appreciate some opinions.
> >
> >About when do we usually expect the end of the MW DX season in Spring?
> >
> >
> >Thanks in advance!
> >
> >Mark Durenberger
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >IRCA mailing list
> >IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
> >the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> >To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
>the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
>the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx