Re: [IRCA] Meet the 3" FSL Tecsun PL-380

[Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx>]

Congratulations, Gary!  I'm very interested in seeing the results.  Perhaps
one will be able to fly with this, something I haven't been able to do with
the larger loops!  Very pertinent, as I sit enjoying the band in Kauai,
wishing that I had a better antenna!  73,  Walt Salmaniw

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Ira Elbert New III <ien3@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Very nice. I'll take one, in red please.
>
> :-)
>
> Bert
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Dec 23, 2015, at 7:57 AM, "David McCormick" <dmccorm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > Wow! Gary you've really stooped to your lowest level this time! Nice
> work, as usual.
> >
> > Dave M.
> >
> >> On Dec 23, 2015, at 7:27 AM, d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello All,
> >>
> >> Portable antenna fanaticism hit a new high (or low, depending upon your
> perspective) this early morning. The photo posted at
> https://app.box.com/s/lxy3b5srx5f66qg4hj6nabxt5gchee3f
> >> shows the 3" FSL Tecsun PL-380, with a directly connected 3" bar FSL
> composed of 8 lightweight Russian surplus 100mm x 20mm x 3mm ferrite bars.
> The radio's internal Si4734 DSP chip tunes the 300 uH FSL antenna coil
> throughout the MW band, so that the DXer simply needs to tune the radio
> (and get the huge sensitivity boost). Initial indications are that the
> modified portable is the most sensitive one ever tested, with a
> science-fiction-like ability to null even local pest stations. Construction
> cost is cheap, also-- about $95 US.
> >>
> >> This is the first portable to have a directly-connected FSL powering
> its operation-- and all indications are that it has the potential to be the
> stand-alone Ultralight of choice for both domestic and transoceanic DXers.
> It outperforms both the 7.5" loopstick PL-380's and CC Skywaves in
> sensitivity and nulling ability by a significant degree. Construction
> information will be forthcoming.
> >>
> >> 73 and Good DX,
> >> Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> IRCA mailing list
> >> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >>
> >> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >>
> >> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >>
> >> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx