[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[IRCA] TP 12 Dec Victoria version
The signal strength monitor said that 1200-1300UT was fairly lively
this morning, unfortunately, the recorder wasn't set for that
time. Otherwise 774 was the most likely to deliver a signal, but
very often wasn't there at all. A bit of a sunrise enhancement
1535-1540UT, but that was mostly carriers.
pretty darn good audio (all of it understandable by a native speaker,
at least briefly):
774 JOUB defying Murphy by peaking across 1200UT, woman in clear
Japanese after the pips. Its half-hearted return didn't start until
1440UT, but it defied Murphy again with a clear "JOUB NHK....hoso"
before anthem and music box after 1540UT. Have to tune up my
Japanese, as it didn't really sound like "NHK dai ni hoso" that I was
expecting.
Reasonable audio at times during the period (much of it
understandable by a native speaker, though often battling w/splash or noise):
1566 HLAZ I'm sure this is pushing it, but it was definitely a man in
Chinese 1534UT, but with erratic fades; probably at this level on peaks
not so reasonable audio, occasional words or phrases in splash or
noise could be understood by a native speaker:
747 JOIB man and woman in Japanese, //774
Burbles in the splatter and noise (if lucky, language might be
guessed at by cadence of talk, or parallel established by changes in
talk or music)
828 JOBB woman in Japanese //774 1443UT
891 NHK pips, man talking, Japanese inflection; 594 wasn't there, but
its brief snippets of audio sounded like this but did not coincide
972 woman talking , maybe Korean 1447UT
1287 pop vocal music, 1547UT very weak for about 30 seconds
Strongish het, no or "near imaginary" audio (either undermodulated or
ravaged by splatter)
738 873 1575 1593
best wishes,
Nick
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx