Re: [IRCA] A Closer Look: the AM Radio Revitalization Order

[Russ Edmunds <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>]

The more pieces of this order I read, the more I become convinced that
taken individually or in concert, many of these proposals which involve
interference are almost certain to make it much worse, likely meaning
either a reduction in coverage area or in some cases simply no improvement.
As a DX'er I expect that if all of this goes forward we may have to adjust
the definition of graveyard frequencies on the AM band.

Russ Edmunds
15 mi NW Phila
Grid FN20id
<wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>

AM: Modified Sony ICF2010's (2) barefoot w/whip
FM: Yamaha T-80 & T-85, each w/ Conrad RDS Decoder;
Onkyo T-450RDS; Tecsun PL-310 ( 2);
modified Sony ICF2010 w/APS9B @ 15';
Grundig G8 w/whip; modified Sony ICF2010 w/whip


On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Dennis Gibson <wb6tnb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> http://www.radioworld.com/article/a-closer-look-the-am-radio-revitalization-order-/277398
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx