Well I don't think 567 was real.... altho it does vary in strength the
carrier showed no signs of propagation smearing like 1566 did... conditions
are somewhat disturbed and the 1566 carrier was close to 5 hz wide tonight
before it quickly faded out at 0525.
73 Don
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 5:02 AM, Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just a weakish carrier here tonight I'm afraid, and 567, nothing.
>
> best wishes,
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> At 04:15 08-06-15, you wrote:
>
>> Both a long way from audio but at times both carriers of similar strengths
>> around 0405, both best on Af beverage. Nick, I'll watch 567 for fade out
>> time, I got here too late to check any fade in times....
>>
>> 73 Don
>> Lamont, Ab
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx