[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] GeoClock
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] GeoClock
- From: Mike Hawkins <michael.d.hawkins@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 21:52:05 -0700
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=0QsurepnOlAtfquW6JPBWbIAzEYSmt1OIgmNJGLq01c=; b=ahdJM6IviGCJOMxSDpz4VczzK4mMZnZLQzf85xxlI38QCPbDvpJ/4q6FtidceImCFu 09DlA6sOxMp9JmicbNihp/0hWXFs393nP3OpUiJOPxwQbS260Vubj8OYRazwKHYpMhfr EFH4vGqvPxxqK19hSyZ83QEl4XHnHy0FWSWFg31dXcXSqP5Bvu1IwrfnI8vJW8j9Qek2 8KBdFC7ydDmjYX13Y4+uP0vPDY4o4VQYwJfw2GlyP1kwHsrgCDgXSpDcfxLlA+9Xj7gO mck212H1WOV2R6YKsyVOsCWiT+RddhBGybf7rBZe9bLpueGzJaPiyC3wWp5tw2ZKUXIm rRhQ==
Compatibility mode solves most problems like that. Right click on any file
in Explorer and go to the COMPATIBILITY settings.
Mike Hawkins
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I suspect Bruce is right...the actual error message burbled on about your
> version of Windows, 32 bit, 64 bit etc. covering all possible error modes,
> barring operation after the year 2000. Chuck is of course correct about
> 32 bit running on 64 bit, but really, it doesn't matter. Apparently the
> program hasn't been used since I moved to Windows 7 some years ago. Now,
> I'm sure there might be a Windows 98 machine around here somewhere...or
> maybe Windows 10 is more forgiving...
>
>
> best wishes,
>
> Nick
>
>
> At 04:27 21-05-15, you wrote:
>
>> I sort of recall my late 90s version of Geoclock not working on my 64 bit
>> Win7 PC, which prompted me to upgrade last year. I think the older
>> versions of Geoclock may be incompatible with newer versions of Windows.
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>> On 5/20/2015 21:00, Chuck Hutton wrote:
>>
>>> GeoClock, like other 32 bit programs, will run on 64 bit machines. It
>>> runs fine here on my 64 bit I7 machines with Win 7.
>>> There must be some other factor involved.....
>>> Chuck
>>>
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx