--- Begin Message ---
- Subject: WFME 1560 pattern
- From: Glenn Hauser <wghauser@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 21:28:31 -0800
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1425101311; bh=Hj+W44Hdu050VXxIF2uV4UjqgIqFLGUa24hjYRnNjSs=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Kc7vnFTrOCjp/snroOSNeoJsT9itCGr+sw8E2VTFYYofXVZxxM/QhSuWPIzBt5DvpTCwjhXSHkdbuLMjAZP4eytz6RAJ51SvkTarQtqZ4fkmK8o82ZCR6hCG/E1rscqby7kHuJGPwl8Y/TAs34s0Kn0ZUpCr0BsMgpFDWLuabwo=
>From OK, where it makes no difference, I`ve been a bit bemused by the big DX opening the absence of WQEW/WFME made further east. Look at the night pattern per FCC, with a deep null at 280 degrees, so it should not have been much of a factor e.g. in Michigan. The minor lobe to the SW shouldn`t be a major blocker at some distance either. Comments whether this seems accurate?
http://transition.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/MB/Databases/AM_DA_patterns/1424019-114635.pdf
Or was most of the DX nominal daytimers when NYC would have been on more troublesome day pattern?
http://transition.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/MB/Databases/AM_DA_patterns/1424019-114634.pdf
73, Glenn Hauser
--- End Message ---