[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Good night last night, and going for 400 stations
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Good night last night, and going for 400 stations
- From: neilkaz <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:35:18 -0600 (GMT-06:00)
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=iyGwum3Kven2Psj/XJF+AV6sqZ/QSlfFmmg9wCE0+flJ6pFmWAy3WqxAhBENeovr; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
I'd not expect skip IBOC to be able to bother freq's 20 KHz away if you have a decent rx, which your SDR certainly is. Now if you're driving around in a typical cx rx, that could be a different story.
The main and brutal IBOC hash occurs from +/- about 10 to 14 KHz away from the offender's freq. This means that KSL's IBOC should be awful from 1146-1150 and from 1170 to 1174. (Yes on good skip nights it can bother me here over 1200 miles away (still 1 hop in winter cx)).
So how should we best listen to 1150 to get less IBOC trash from KSL? USB..yes upper sideband! This will take out considerably more IBOC than listening in LSB will. Of course if KSL is strong enough to severely slop 1150, then you have issues in USB and an unworkable situation. How should we best listen to 1140? LSB of course! This should render anything on 1146 as no factor. IBOC should only be a problem on 1140 LSB if you live in close groundwave range to KSL.
ie here I am 14 miles from WBBM and 19 from WSCR and their IBOC's do mess up channels +/- 20 KHz away, but these are 50 kW ND over conductive midwest ground. Using the proper sideband to get further away from the IBOC helps.
73 KAZ
-----Original Message-----
>From: Brian Rachford <azswdxing@xxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Jan 10, 2015 3:07 AM
>To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [IRCA] Good night last night, and going for 400 stations
>
>Although I'm certain that I've received KCKY and its Spanish format, its
>groundwave is weak and its skywave is not reliable and I've never
>officially logged it. Plus, IBOC hash from KSL keeps me from working 1140,
>1150, 1170, and 1180 at night as much as I would like, even with my phased
>system. KSL is strong enough that I occasionally get HD locks on my car
>radio driving around town at night from 430 miles away.
>
>Brian
>
>
>On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Mike Sanburn <mikesanburn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>wrote:
>
>> Congrats on the KAGO catch Brian. Is KCKY 1150 a pest for you? Ms
>>
>> Sent from my iPod
>>
>> > On Jan 9, 2015, at 11:23 PM, Brian Rachford <azswdxing@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > Got it, and a pretty good one:
>> >
>> > 1150 KAGO, Klamath Falls OR, weak at 10:38pm (0538UT), 1000W, call (new;
>> > phaser), 732 miles
>> >
>> > I had to process the audio a bit to be sure, because there were a couple
>> of
>> > poorly-timed fraction-of-a-second fadeouts, particularly on the letter
>> "G",
>> > but I ended up with "The Basin('s) information station, NewsTalk 11-50,
>> > K-A-G-O", then back into Coast To Coast. Just my 3rd on this frequency
>> > (KEIB, KSAL).
>> >
>> > Thanks for the kind words Les and Martin. I'm glad I found this list and
>> > there has been a lot of interesting and useful stuff here. I'm way
>> behind
>> > in tallying up how many hours of listening it's taken for this, although
>> I
>> > know that from mid-August through October, I was averaging about 15 hours
>> > per week and that's probably still about right. I'm on the computer for
>> > this anyway with the RTL-SDR receiver, so when I'm sitting on a frequency
>> > waiting for something, I can some multi-tasking. I occasionally do
>> > unattended recordings, but an overwhelming majority is live listening.
>> I'm
>> > lucky to have few local stations and a pretty clean RF environment,
>> except
>> > I lose some directions on lower frequencies to QRM when I have the loop
>> > indoors this time of year.
>> >
>> > As far as stats:
>> > United States 304 in 25 states
>> > CA - 74
>> > AZ - 57 (of 73)
>> > CO - 29
>> > UT - 24
>> > TX - 23
>> > NM - 17
>> > ID,NV - 11
>> > WY - 8
>> > MT,WA - 7
>> > OR - 6
>> > NE - 5
>> > KS,OK - 4
>> > LA - 3
>> > IL,IA,MN,MO,PA - 2
>> > AR,ND,OH,TN - 1
>> >
>> > Mexico 80 in 10 estados
>> > CH - 25
>> > BN - 22
>> > SO - 18
>> > SI - 7
>> > CI,NL - 2
>> > CS,DF,DU,TM - 1
>> >
>> > Canada - 9 in 4 provinces
>> > AB - 4
>> > BC,SK - 2
>> > ON - 1
>> >
>> > Cuba - 5
>> > Japan - 1
>> > Rep. of Korea - 1
>> >
>> > Distance (mi):
>> >> 5000 - 2
>> > 2000-2500 - 2
>> > 1500-1999 - 8
>> > 1000-1499 - 33
>> > 750- 999 - 39
>> > 600- 749 - 34
>> > 500- 599 - 63
>> > 400- 499 - 42
>> > 300- 399 - 59
>> > 200- 299 - 54
>> > 100- 199 - 36
>> > 50- 99 - 22 (out of 24)
>> > 0- 49 - 6 (out of 6)
>> >
>> > Nearest miss: 600 KVNA Flagstaff AZ (65 mi), although I think I've had
>> the
>> > call letters on the car radio in town
>> > Most distant: 1566 HLAZ Jeju REP KOREA (6390 mi)
>> > Longest overland: 1060 KYW Philadelphia PA (2067 mi)
>> > Most distant graveyarder: 1240 KODY North Platte NE (785 mi)
>> >
>> > Including later re-logs, I've heard the call letters for almost 300 of
>> the
>> > stations (with 200 recordings) and nearly all of the rest are from a
>> > combination of matching a webcast plus hearing a slogan or a distinctive
>> > location over the air. I continue to try to get call letters and
>> > recordings to "upgrade" the quality of the logging of a station. It's
>> > still hard to imagine racking up the totals compiled by many of the
>> people
>> > here!
>> >
>> > Brian Rachford - Prescott, AZ
>> > azswdxing@xxxxxxxxx
>> > http://azswdxing.wordpress.com/
>> >
>> >> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Brian Rachford <azswdxing@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> (6-foot tuned loop + 23-foot tuned vertical + Quantum Phaser + RTL-SDR)
>> >>
>> >> Had a good night last night (including a new Mexican state) to put me up
>> >> to 399 stations from this location since August 15th:
>> >>
>> >> 1320 XECPN, Piedras Negras CI, weak at 11:30pm (0630UT), 100W (or
>> not...),
>> >> webcast and slogan (new; phaser), 809 miles
>> >> 1630 KRND, Fox Farm WY, weak at 12:29am (0729UT), 1000W, webcast and
>> >> slogan (new; loop), 618 miles
>> >> 1550 XENU, Nuevo Laredo TM, weak at 1:00am (0800UT), 250W (or not...),
>> >> call (new estado; phaser), 893 miles
>> >> 1490 KCPX, Spanish Valley UT, very weak at 1:52am (0752UT), 1000W, call
>> >> (new; phaser), 320 miles
>> >>
>> >> Hoping for #400 tonight before I doze off at the dials...
>> >>
>> >> Brian Rachford - Prescott, AZ
>> >> azswdxing@xxxxxxxxx
>> >> http://azswdxing.wordpress.com/
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > IRCA mailing list
>> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>> >
>> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>> >
>> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>> >
>> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>Brian Rachford - Prescott, AZ
>azswdxing@xxxxxxxxx
>http://azswdxing.wordpress.com/
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx