[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Help with a couple UNIDs
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Help with a couple UNIDs
- From: Brian Rachford <azswdxing@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 21:06:19 -0700
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=kdO0dc2PfR/T0tetRUUEW1pD4TdGGkCjUOsUWbuqvbY=; b=ZAQhQ7fKK7S8EN0GqWYF7w+dwuA3rMq/Vt+9kHJ/xihelpIuek/OdWP73RG96xbfPJ sqJpzZNNhMxLdJwPOzix3PmEwAJPeCaGJJdcwN9Nyfkxw0pnT3Hu7VoF1LXYgkJYGbT/ QHmkU9WjDttJbEWBK7CAQ9mVv+y8Fwu2H0dnhyfljVSmxTZJ8BzsJZD8TFbFTEV+QI2i QKyJVOKVmdNMlAUJYT6ftuFv8E++/oQiDubcAv6wCvZdO6aW3zIyHPQz08JfbZNkzqoH bZb12VOZwQeL75a8caRxW9Pe0GcsOcdD7428BBcaHMmqstXznwCVtfWZTdmrzN1fZm0W mdhA==
Neil,
I seem to get a fairly stable rotatable cardioid pattern. This is most
obvious when I have two stations nearly opposite one another and can rotate
the loop 180 degrees to go from a peak on one to a peak on the other, then
can flip the "invert" switch on the phaser to go right back to the first
station.
I hadn't really tested the broadband aspect of the phaser null up until
now, but I did this evening. Indeed, the null holds up reasonably well
between 680 KNBR and 810 KGO. But, I have to say that I wasn't getting the
greatest of nulls with either of these. I'm not sure if that had to do
with conditions or what else. In any case, with a tuned loop and a tuned
vertical, I have to twiddle knobs to go from one to another. I need to
test this some more.
I have found that for strong signals, the Q is a bit too sharp on the
pre-selector so I get some leakage through the null from several kHz on
either side of the carrier, especially on lower frequencies. The
pre-selector is noticeably sharper than my loop.
Brian
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 8:47 AM, neilkaz <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> OK that setup should work well and be quite versatile. Are you getting a
> true cardioid pattern or at least something close that can be adjusted and
> aimed as you rotate the loop, perhaps required some retweaking?
>
> How broadbanded is the back null? ie lets say you null out KNBR to your
> NW, is KCBS in a deep null with the same phaser setting? What about KGO? Is
> a little phase and amplitude balance tweaking needed or a lot to switch
> from best null of KNBR to a decent null of KGO?
>
> Glad to hear that you don't have a big noise issue on your recordings. 73
> KAZ
>
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: Brian Rachford <azswdxing@xxxxxxxxx>
> >Sent: Dec 21, 2014 8:54 AM
> >To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <
> irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: Re: [IRCA] Help with a couple UNIDs
> >
> >Wow, that was really good! With your tip, I was finally able to pick out
> >"Escucha, eckes-eh-hay-elay" at the beginning and "Navajoa, Sonora,
> Mexico"
> >near the end of the clip. That's certainly not what I heard at first, but
> >I can agree with that now. I hadn't thought too much about hearing
> issues,
> >but I know that I'm a little weak on voices and pretty good with music.
> >
> >Oh yeah, I'm using a Quantum Phaser with a 6-foot tuned loop and a 23-foot
> >vertical. The latter is run through an MFJ amplified pre-selector. This
> >is a new setup that is working well.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Brian
> >
> >
> >On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 10:33 PM, neilkaz <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> 1270 is 100% for sure XEGL Navajoa per call ID's and Navajoa and Navajoa
> >> Sonora Mexico ments.
> >>
> >> My ears while very good with spoken word (especially male) are very bad
> >> with singing (almost hopeless if female) (was certified 2/3 tone deaf
> when
> >> 5 years old) and I copy nothing on 1450 that is calls.
> >>
> >> What are you phasing that loop against? What loop? What phaser?
> >>
> >> 73 KAZ
> >>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx