Re: [IRCA] WYLL 1160 Chicago - splatter

[Forrest Skaine <todftscytj7707@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Dennis. For me their signal strength has been the same.

Sincerely,
Todd Skaine
Woodbury, MN
Sony ICF 2010
Superradio 2
Grundig S350 &M400
Toyota car radio
On Nov 18, 2014 10:27 PM, "Dennis Gibson" <wb6tnb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This is another example of why I do not trust radio-locator. It has a
> question mark after the words construction permit.
>
> The 12.5 kW (25% of licensed power) operation is an STA to operate from
> its day site at night "due to a complete malfunction of the nighttime
> transmitter".
>
> I recommend the FCC website or FCCInfo.com over radio-locator. Neither are
> difficult to use.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On Nov 18, 2014, at 8:04 PM, Forrest Skaine <todftscytj7707@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > Even though It's auroral Tom I don't believe they are on their new night
> > facility. Radio Locator shows their new power to be 12.5KW! They would
> be a
> > lot weaker here I would imagine. I will keep watching this.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Todd Skaine
> > Woodbury, MN
> > Sony ICF 2010
> > Superradio 2
> > Grundig S350 &M400
> > Toyota car radio
> >> On Nov 18, 2014 9:58 PM, <amdxer@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> WYLL 1160khz night signal is splattering from 1020 to
> >> 1080khz and from 1240 to 1290khz.  Can easily hear
> >> this at home and on car radio in and around Joliet.
> >> First noticed this about a week ago.  With two
> >> radios, one tuned to 1160 and a second on 1040 the WYLL
> >> audio matches the splatter.
> >>
> >> Their night site is
> >> 10 miles NE of my home.  This evening I drove out on
> >> I355 right past their 6 tower site and the splattering is
> >> much stronger there.  No doubt it is from them.
> >>
> >> Also noticed that there are NO tower lights on any
> >> of the six towers.
> >>
> >> On Radio Locator for WYLL
> >> noticed a CP for relocating night site to their day site
> >> closer to Chicago.  CP is dated Sept 19,
> >> 2014!
> >>
> >> Tom Jasinski
> >> Joliet,
> >> IL
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> IRCA mailing list
> >> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >>
> >> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> >> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >>
> >> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >>
> >> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx