[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] KRKO DIGITAL



KSL does the same thing here on 1170. Not so much on 1150. But there are nights KPUG/KFAQ are buried in the hash. Stations going full HD does not look good for DXing, but the hybrid mode now is not great either.

Patrick

Patrick Martin
Seaside OR
KGED QSL Manager

> From: Mark4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2014 18:52:40 -0500
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] KRKO DIGITAL
> 
> KSL puts in enough digital sideband hash to eliminate 1150 and 1170 in 
> Minnesota at night :-))
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Mark Durenberger
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Patrick Martin
> Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2014 4:24 PM
> To: IRCA
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] KRKO DIGITAL
> 
> Rick,
> 
> If that is the case, then I do not see an all digital  happening. However, 
> going back to the early 90s, when Bob Rusk did one of the first articles on 
> IBOC for Radio World, I thought at the time, the FCC would never okay such a 
> noise maker. I was wrong as many were in the industry at the time. Here, the 
> all digital on 1380 last night did not seem to interfere with 1390 as much. 
> The bandwidth seemed more narrow, but KRKO is not a powerhouse here, so if 
> someone like KSL decided to go all digital it may be a difference situation. 
> KRKO is stronger than KKXA is by far, but still no powerhouse. KIRO is the 
> strongest Puget Sound station I receive day or night, followed by KJR.  KIRO 
> has about 86 KW aimed at me.  None of the Puget Sound IBOCers are really 
> that strong here. 1090 isn't either.  My worst offender is KSL, followed by 
> probably KFBK. KFBK is not really that listenable in analog as with the high 
> end part of the band, night fades, often they sound like they are 
> broadcasting
> from a barrel. KCBS is also IBOC, but doesn't QRN as much running most of 
> their power South. I will try for the KKXA test tonight, but I don't feel I 
> will have much luck, not with KGDD in the mix. KKXA is almost DX here at 
> night. KKXA IS DX days and tough to get. KGDD sends their power to the W/NW.
> 
> 73,
> 
> Patrick
> 
> Patrick Martin
> Seaside OR
> KGED QSL Manager
> 
> > From: ricklew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2014 10:41:39 -0700
> > Subject: Re: [IRCA] KRKO DIGITAL
> >
> > Hi Pete and All,
> > 1370 is covered in noise, and 1360 is more affected by the noise than in
> > hybrid HD mode.
> > I believe I'm about 30 miles from the transmitter.
> > In this test I don't know what they've done and what they haven't done.
> > No question about it; KRKO wasn't decoding before the test; they are now.
> > As expected, their HD coverage is better.
> > But the bit rate isn't better, so the audio is swishy and unpleasant. The
> > highs are artificial, and the audio is fatiguing.
> > On average, the Sony takes about four seconds to decode the signal versus
> > about eight seconds in hybrid mode.
> > HD proponents would undoubtedly consider this a success.
> > As a listener, even putting my DX preferences aside, I expected better. I
> > wouldn't listen to audio like this on a PC, and I certainly wouldn't do it
> > on a radio.
> > Standard AM sounds better. It may have fewer highs, (and I love hearing 
> > high
> > frequencies!), but it's easier on the ears.
> > --
> > Rick
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: IRCA [mailto:irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pete Taylor
> > Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2014 10:11 AM
> > To: IRCA of America
> > Subject: [IRCA] KRKO DIGITAL
> >
> > I tuned in to KRKO-1380 about 10:03 PDT this morning and it was operating 
> > in
> > normal analog. At 10:05, it switched to digital. All white noise which
> > extended over 1390. I couldn't tell what was happening on 1370 since the
> > KKMO-1360 transmitter is one mile away.
> >
> > Pete Taylor
> > Tacoma, WA
> > 12225w 4719n
> > HQ180 & ICF2010
> > Kiwa aircore & Palomar loops
> > DX398, SRF-59 & M37V
> > Eton E100 + Tecsun PL-300/380
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
 		 	   		  
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx