[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] coastal TAs...1566



Definitely the one to watch this evening; noticeable carrier at 0348UT. Seems pretty close to 1566.000 here also, and I believe that Benin is pretty much on nominal, though the MW offset list is getting on a year old now. Time for one of us to ID it and snag its offset or lack of it.

best wishes,

Nick


At 19:33 25-08-14, you wrote:
Checking my Perseus recording last night at 0402, 1566.000 shows a decent
carrier (pretty close, I haven't calibrated in a while) but no audio..  At
the same time 1503 has a very weak het.   Using the European beverage,
~800' at 45 deg.

Don Moman
Lamont, Ab.


On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 7:07 PM, neilkaz <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Agreed. Iran on 1566 doesn't get out well compared to blasters like 1503.
> We really cannot trust the listed powers for these.  73 KAZ
>
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: Sylvain Naud <sylvainnaud62@xxxxxxxxx>
> >Sent: Aug 25, 2014 1:49 PM
> >To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <
> irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: Re: [IRCA] coastal TAs...
> >
> >If it was after 3:15 UTC, that was most likely Benin, especially at this
> >time of the year.
> >
> >I never heard Iran on 1566 as far I can remember.
> >
> >Sylvain Naud
> >Portneuf, QC.
> >
> >
> >Le 2014-08-25 12:13, Mike Stonebridge a écrit :
> >> Never checked until late because of earlier arrangements, but TAs were
> >> in here too. Many frequencies showed faint carriers. Poor audio on
> >> 1215 and 1566 only. 1215 was probably the UK, but I don't know who was
> >> on 1566 as I have never logged a TA here, but could have been Iran.
> >>
> >> Mike in St Isidore, AB
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> IRCA mailing list
> >> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >>
> >> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
> >> the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >>
> >> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >>
> >> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >IRCA mailing list
> >IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> >To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx