Re: [IRCA] QSL archival -was- Re: [NRC-AM] More on mergers

[Patrick Martin <mwdxer@xxxxxxxxx>]

I wonder if there is an QSL archival location other than in the US that the collections could be shipped to? It would be expensive, but if there was, it would be better that tossing them away. I still have not mad a decision on what to do with mine when I pass on. With other 3,000 MW QSLs alone, and another 1,000 of SW, FM, TV, and so on. But I guess if there is no where to send them, maybe it is time we think about some other museum that may want them. Arthur Cushen in NZ has his own I believe in Invercargill. It is had to believe Arthur died back in 1997, but it is getting close to 17 years ago. I do not know how the museum is paid for, but maybe we could get something like that here?

Patrick

Patrick Martin
Seaside OR
KGED QSL Manager

> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 12:07:25 +0000
> From: rfoxwor1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: am@xxxxxxxxxxx; irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [IRCA] QSL archival -was- Re: [NRC-AM]  More on mergers
> 
> I'd like to start a thread about verification archival, if I may,
> which I suppose is somewhat distantly related to the merger thread.
> I was around in the 1960's and actually still have some of the
> material that circulated by mail back then. But that's not why
> I write now.
> 
> Any of us who were around in the 60's realize the age issues that
> we face. I had registered my QSL collection with the CPRV archival
> service in 1989, but still have my QSL's today. They fairly comfortably
> fit into two standard briefcases. The "good ones" along with the mundane.
> 
> On August 15 of last year I got a letter from CPRV saying in effect that
> was no more interest in acquiring new collections because of so much
> overlap with existing material. I can understand this, it's a hard
> argument to refute.
> 
> In my own case I'd estimate that I have maybe 20 to 30 verifications
> that have significant archival interest. The rest of them (hundreds)
> are just like the 1 kw daytimers 500 miles away I used to hear at 6 AM
> sign-on with regularity.
> 
> The consequence of this is there is no longer any means for me to seek
> archival of the maybe 20 verifications I really care about as they are
> regarded the same as the 1 kw daytimer sign-on from 500 miles away
> verie that already has been submitted and 'registered' by others.
> 
> As I see it, I no longer have any means to archive _any_ of the QSL's I have.
> This includes such as the 2-page letter I got from VSZ-1 Tarawa in 1971
> which I really think has archival value. Or correspondence from Radio Swan
> on 1160 in 1960.
> 
> No one I know would have any interest in spending all the time it would take
> to parse them out onto eBay. As it stands, on my passing (I am 71) all
> this material would be thrown out, unless I can find a recipient during
> my lifetime.
> 
> Is anyone thinking about this?
> 
> - Bob Foxworth
> 
> 
> 
> ---- Russ Edmunds <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> > In an earlier post, I had made mention that I didn't see that a merger would happen except out of necessity
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
 		 	   		  
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx