[IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 3-14
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 3-14



Hello All,

Asian results here this morning seemed somewhat better than Dennis' report, but not by much. There was some good audio from several of the TP big guns from 1250-1415, but without any dramatic sunrise enhancement fireworks like yesterday.

The session started off with very potent audio from 1566-HLAZ at 1252, but that was the strongest signal of the entire morning, and nothing very interesting happened after that. Like yesterday the usual low band regulars (594-JOAK, 603-HLSA, 693-JOAB and 738-BEL2) rotated in and out with fair audio from 1300-1400, along with occasional good audio from the two Korean big guns, 972-HLCA and 1566-HLAZ. Around 1400 the low-band Japanese seemed to get a moderate daylight boost, raising 594-JOAK and 693-JOAB up to good levels, along with 531-JOQG to a fair level. Unlike yesterday the low-band Asian mainland stations stayed at anemic levels, though, with 603-HLSA, 639-CNR1 and 657-Pyongyang only managing fair audio at best from 1400-1415. Compared to 603-HLSA's awesome fade-in yesterday during the same time period this morning's performance seemed like a real clunker.The high band featured 1287-JOHR with fair peaks from 1330-1400, 1377-CNR1 with good signals in and out of the KRKO !
 splatter around 1405, along with fair signals intermittently from 1503-JOUK, 1566-HLAZ and 1593-CNR1. Compared to yesterday the Asians were pretty lackluster with very few energetic signals, and those were all from the usual big guns.

73 and Good DX,
Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
C.Crane SWP 7.5" Slider loopstick Ultralight +
12" Experimental FSL antenna





  
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx