Re: [IRCA] Seattle's 1090 Now Using IBOC

[neilkaz <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

CBS for some reason is gradually restoring and adding IBOC to some of its stations. Most notably here near Chicago where I once again am plagued by IBOC from WSCR.  73 KAZ

-----Original Message-----
>From: Rick Lewis <ricklew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Mar 11, 2014 8:15 AM
>To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [IRCA] Seattle's 1090 Now Using IBOC
>
>Hi Patrick,
>I'll check later today. But definitely IBOC on Monday morning and at around 
>9 PM yesterday as well.
>--
>Rick
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Patrick Martin" <mwdxer@xxxxxxxxx>
>To: "IRCA" <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 1:25 AM
>Subject: Re: [IRCA] Seattle's 1090 Now Using IBOC
>
>
>Were they testing, or is it a Daytime thing? I just tried here on the 
>Northern OR coast, 110 miles from KFNQ, and I get no IBOC hash. I get a bit 
>on 1080, off the SW EWE, but I presume that from KNX, but nothing noted 
>otherwise. KFNQ in quite strong here off the NE EWE too. No hash on 1100 
>either. But at least no sign of any hash now. I will try tomorrow during the 
>day. Strange that any new IBOCers on AM. Who is listening to IBOC on AM?
>
>73,
>
>Patrick
>
>Patrick Martin
>Seaside OR
>KGED QSL Manager
>
>> From: ricklew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 22:33:29 -0700
>> Subject: [IRCA] Seattle's 1090 Now Using IBOC
>>
>> I may be late to this party, but noticed yesterday that KFNQ-1090 in 
>> Seattle
>> is now running IBOC. Not too surprising, since it's owned by CBS.
>> Years ago I used to see them on IBOC lists but never heard the slightest
>> hint of hash.
>> Now 1080 and 1100 may be history here.
>> Noted them with IBOC yesterday.
>> I don't often visit that part of the dial, so don't know when they began
>> using it, but it should easily decode on an HD radio here.
>> --
>> Rick Lewis
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
>IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx