Re: [IRCA] Radio's Digital Dilemma

[Patrick Martin <mwdxer@xxxxxxxxx>]

Chuck,

I hope you are right that AM IBOC's days are numbered. I yes, it is doing on on FM though.

Patrick

Patrick Martin
Seaside OR
KGED QSL Manager

> From: charlesh3@xxxxxxx
> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 02:37:57 +0000
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] Radio's Digital Dilemma
> 
> And would I be correct to assume there has been no new adaptor of AM IBOC in say 3 or 4 years? If so, I'll round this off and say half of the IBOC soldiers have suffered mortal wounds and the other half have numbered days.
>  
> Let's tell 'em "We told you so", Barry. Or better put, they never had enough technical ammo to make the fight win-able, so all we had to do was wait for them to surrender when the market said "so what?" to AM IBOC.
>  
> Chuck
>  
> > Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 21:16:53 -0500
> > From: bm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [IRCA] Radio's Digital Dilemma
> > 
> > On 01/01/2014 08:34 PM, Chuck Hutton wrote:
> > > Do you have rough (or better) numbers for the number of AM stations transmitting IBOC at the peak and today? It seems there have been no new major users of IBOC since the initial phase, and a lot (half?) of the original supporters have turned it off and said "why bother?".
> > 
> > I haven't tracked the numbers over time, but they've been steadily 
> > declining for the past three or four years.  A total of about 310 AM 
> > stations have run IBOC at one time or another, but only about 175 (or 
> > maybe less) are still using it today.  Most of those are either owned by 
> > iBiquity investors, or their IBOC conversion was subsidized by the 
> > Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
> > 
> > It's obviously an abject failure... unfortunately, it lingers on.
> > 
> > Barry
> > 
> > -- 
> > Barry McLarnon  Ottawa, ON
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > 
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > 
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > 
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
>  		 	   		  
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
 		 	   		  
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx