Re: [IRCA] Unid off Freq. 940.173

[Mike Sanburn <mikesanburn@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I should get the latest IRCA Mexican log. I assume XEMMM moved to 940 from 800?  ms

> From: wb6tnb@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 23:08:59 -0700
> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] Unid off Freq. 940.173
> 
> My observation in Southern California is that XEMMM has been high in frequency for at least three years. When I can null KFIG or it takes a fade I can occasionally make out the programming, which I have been able to match to its webstream. 
> 
> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 21:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Glenn Hauser <wghauser@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] Unid off Freq. 940.173
> 
> Walt,
> 
> XEMMM in Mexicali. Discussed this recently in my logs. Always hear the het in the morning here. Getting definite ID is tough, but DF fits and there have been previous logs of it. See MW offsets list:
> 
> 940  940.174     MEX XEMMM-AM 940 Oldies (Mexicali/Santa Isabel)                                               [939.9839-]         20100406
> 
> 73, Glenn Hauser, OK
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
 		 	   		  
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx