[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] TP's loggings take two emails
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] TP's loggings take two emails
- From: Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 02:07:27 +0000
That's unfortunate. I've had the same happen as well after Masset. Gave
up posting to IRCA and went to dxld instead, where they are more receptive
to real DX. May I suggest that this policy needs a rethink...Walt
Salmaniw, Victoria, BC
On Sunday, October 6, 2013, wrote:
>
> Hi Dennis,
>
> <<< My report from this morning was so large that it took to emails to
> sent it to
> the IRCA reflector. First report was over 35 kb. I have had larger
> reports in
> the past with no problems, something changed? >>>
>
> Sorry about your problem, Dennis. This also happened to me after the two
> Oregon coast DXpeditions this summer, when I attempted to post a list of
> the DU loggings (with mp3 links) on the IRCA list. After being rejected the
> first time due to the length of the post, I split it up into two parts, and
> finally three parts-- but it was still rejected. I finally gave up, and
> posted the list on the NRC and Ultralightdx reflectors. This problem didn't
> happen after last year's summer DXpeditions.
>
> 73, Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dennis Vroom <vroomski@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>>
> To: irca <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>>
> Sent: Sun, Oct 6, 2013 6:18 pm
> Subject: [IRCA] TP's loggings take two emails
>
>
> Good evening,
>
> My report from this morning was so large that it took to emails to sent it
> to
> the IRCA reflector. First report was over 35 kb. I have had larger
> reports in
> the past with no problems, something changed?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Dennis,
> Kalama, WA
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original
> contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its
> editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx