Re: [IRCA] 1386 kHz... Guinea?

[Mauno Ritola <Mauno.Ritola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I think Guinea has been off for some years already.

73, Mauno

31.5.2013 9:36, Nick Hall-Patch kirjoitti:
> Nothing that low in frequency Neil. However....there was a  very weak 
> carrier 1386.000kHz, maybe a few tenths of a Hertz low, heard before 
> 0555, disappeared 0609UT, back  around 0613UT.  But Labe sunrise is 
> about 0625UT, and at 0630UT, this carrier is going "strong" (i.e. 
> barely audible)....so much more likely to be New Zealand....
>
> So the only thing fading out is me; off to bed.
>
> best wishes,
>
> Nick
>
>
> At 15:24 30-05-13, you wrote:
> > Thx, for any of you guys who can stay up that late normally (being 
> > two time zones west of here helps) do you ever check for any trace of 
> > Guinea on 1385.92a? Similar path, and similar high end frequency to 
> > hopefully enjoy similar enhancement. Guinea is listed (EMWG) as 
> > coming on at 0555. 73 KAZ
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > >From: Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>
> > >Sent: May 30, 2013 12:28 AM
> > >To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America 
> > <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >Subject: Re: [IRCA] 1566 kHz... Benin?
> > >
> > >Well, it's 0525UT, and the 1566 carrier is pretty much inaudible, a
> > >few blips of signal left in the Spectran display, and that's
> > >it.   But a few minutes before, quite a definite carrier on the 
> > channel.
> > >
> > >best wishes,
> > >
> > >Nick
> > >
> > >
> > >At 22:41 29-05-13, you wrote:
> > >>I checked it at 2230 close-down, it was very close to nominal, I'd
> > >>say not lower than 1565.9998 kHz.
> > >>
> > >>73, Mauno
> > >>Finland
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >IRCA mailing list
> > >IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > >
> > >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
> > the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > >
> > >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > >
> > >To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
> > the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
> the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx