[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] TP 27 Feb; Victoria version
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] TP 27 Feb; Victoria version
- From: d1028gary@xxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:11:52 -0500 (EST)
Hi Derek,
<<< Is there any video of the meet??? >>>
Sorry, Derek, but no video was shot of the get-together. I thought about bringing my camcorder to record the event, but figured that my chances of escaping in one piece after recording our (mature) appearances would be slim.
73, Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: Derek Vincent <eargazimm@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed, Feb 27, 2013 5:30 pm
Subject: Re: [IRCA] TP 27 Feb; Victoria version
Is there any video of the meet???
Thanks
DerekVmedia@xxxxxxx
ChannelDerek.carbonmade.com
On Feb 27, 2013, at 4:20 PM, d1028gary@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Hi Nick,
>
> It was great to see you (and Theo, Chuck, Guy, Tom, Bruce, Phil and others) at
Bruce's get-together on Saturday. At least for me, the best aspect of these
meetings is the chance to reassure each other that we are still halfway normal
individuals, despite our tendency to sacrifice sleep and comfort to chase the
same big-gun TP's over and over each morning.
>
> The band was full of promising low-band TP signals here around 1415 this
morning (594, 603, 738, 747, 828, 972, 1134, 1566 and 1575), but without any
sunrise enhancement boost the Asians soon fizzled out, one by one. 972-HLCA and
1566-HLAZ were the sole survivors after 1500 (both with fair signals, in and
out), but they soon bit the dust as well.
>
> 73 and Good DX,
> Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
> C.Crane SWP 7.5" Slider loopstick Ultralight +
> 8" Medium Wave FSL antenna (DXing indoors)
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>
> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wed, Feb 27, 2013 1:42 pm
> Subject: [IRCA] TP 27 Feb; Victoria version
>
>
> Signals were reasonable on the low band when I tuned in at 1430UT,
> but mostly went downhill after that. NHK2 had yet another s/off time
> today, starting the music box at 1455UT
>
> pretty darn good audio (all of it understandable by a native speaker, at least
> briefly):
>
> not quite
>
>
> reasonable audio at times during the period (much of it understandable by a
> native speaker, though often battling w/splash or noise):
>
>
> 594 JOAK instrumental mx 1443UT, JJ talk at a lower level a few minutes
earlier
> 747 JOIK EE lessons //774 1429UT
> 774 JOUB EE lessons 1429UT
> 828 JOBB EE lessons //774 1430UT
>
>
>
> not so reasonable audio, occasional words or phrases in splash or
> noise could be
> understood by a native speaker:
>
> 639 CNR1 woman in CC //6125 1434UT
> 972 HLCA woman in KK 1450UT; best signal noted on this one this
> morning, so there was "some" enhancement
>
>
> Burbles in the splatter and noise (if lucky, language might be guessed at by
> cadence of talk, or parallel established by changes in talk or music) :
>
> 567 JOIK man in JJ //594 1431UT
> 612 4QR? man talking DU EE inflection 1435UT
> 891 woman talking, not //594, 1432UT
> 1116 4BC? woman talking DU EE inflection 1437UT
> 1566 traces of mx 1430UT, never much better than this.
>
> Strongish het, no audio (either undermodulated or ravaged by splatter):
>
> 558 756 864 1008 1017 1098 1575
>
>
>
>
> best wishes,
>
> Nick
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original
> contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its
> editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its
editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its
editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx