[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] TP DX 20 Jan
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] TP DX 20 Jan
- From: Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 07:56:08 -0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :to:x-greylist:x-greylist:x-virus-scanned:x-virus-status :x-spam-status:x-spam-checker-version:x-content-filtered-by:subject :x-beenthere:x-mailman-version:precedence:reply-to:list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-post:list-help:list-subscribe:errors-to :sender:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UQeZnx+ebhp4DHuKNLt5XuawVEPEYCpxIXnPJfOUl1A=; b=Jk4+0LvRfCieqFZmM31wSWQqQgjdLH0hy944pMcnJYcwYodoPV7rikcXHAzoDrAaMM IODPb14OwWVx58Ysgt+yHS8dMO8fsZRAbgjDIs+3TeDj4/RLTq9yGPAI4BHNW3tBfDWy uBJD4u2XmSWHJjyFXXOaIQzrjY4wIDKEXxGoMLxm3ZABOs9DGTPHyoFtS1sFe0yepL1x ElDLH2IwFNlZrHDfns+hwUq+e+jPw/ymDSvLfyjCO8XsgQ2umhEVaxsE1DE8xfz3O3xF /ki9fTLcRX8q0EI0zQsPsr9UEIA6Zc60eS3CME7eKW4hbIylCGD1oZmVJlj+ropwhenf 8d7Q==
Slept in today, but at 15:50, 594 NHK1, and 972 Korea are both still very
respectable. Strong carriers on 558, 567, 828, 873, 891, 936, 1332, and
many other weaker carriers still present. Many of these were presumably
NHK2 open carriers. Guess I may have missed a decent morning! 73, Walt
Salmaniw, Victoria, BC
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 1420-1430UT in Victoria, the lower part of the band is pretty lively
> compared with the last couple of days. Mostly Japanese, and the regulars,
> but channels such as 567 and 891 are showing their noses also, and some
> mysteries such as 909 and 639 (doesn't appear to be CNR1, but very weak) as
> well.
> best wishes,
>
> Nick
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx