[IRCA] TP Oct 18, 2012 / Victoria version

[Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>]

The enhancement such as it was this morning was for a few Asiatics in 
the upper band, but it seemed to include Family Radio 1557 and CNR on 
1593 which are definitely second tier here.   Nothing had much 
strength however, and  what little was on the low band seemed DU, and 
before 1400UT.


pretty darn good audio (all of it understandable by a native speaker, at least
briefly):

none


reasonable audio  at  times during the period (much of it understandable by a
native speaker, though often battling w/splash or noise):

none



not so reasonable audio, occasional words or phrases in splash or 
noise could be
understood by a native speaker:

1557 WYFR slow talking man at 1413, couldn't tell language, but after 
organ mx at 1420UT, caught the EE words (mostly in the recording 
after the fact):  "this has been.....Bible reading.....God's word"; 
not much, but better than anything else this morning


Burbles in the splatter and noise (if lucky, language might be guessed at by
cadence of talk, or parallel established by changes in talk or music) :

(both 774 and 828 had talk around 1355UT, but nothing to hang my hat on)
891 DU EE sounding woman at 1318UT
1503 JOUK NHK pips at 1400UT
1566 HLAZ man talking, JJ inflection 1321UT; after 1400UT there were 
a number of times when a CC sounding man was barely audible
1575 man talking, too much splash to get anything, at 1408UT
1593 CNR1 insistent sounding woman talking 1411UT, at the same time, 
similar sounding woman talking on 6125.   A man on 1593 coincided 
with a man on 6125;  too much of an offset to say they were parallel though.



Strongish het, no audio (either undermodulated or ravaged by splatter):

594  1512



best wishes,

Nick
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx