[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] NF ULR TA DX
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] NF ULR TA DX
- From: Chernos Saul <sauldx@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 02:44:30 +0000
The really good ULRs are way more senstitive than you think. Still, 1000 feet of wire, taught in a particular direction, phasers, high-end receiver, all the bells and whistles, knowledge of a few dozen languages - aaaahhhh! All I can ask for, on top of that tall order, is someone to pay me a salary as a professional DXer. Call it scientific research... > From: jwkral@xxxxxxxx
> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] NF ULR TA DX
>
> I'm amazed at Alan Willie's TA DX list of snags with an otherwise not so sensitive little pocket radio and also a little envious since I'm not even getting any TPs with a fairly good full sized portable but then he's much closer to his TAs than I am to my TPs. But anyway whenever he sends in a report it always mentions the ultralights. I'd like to see what the results would be if he used a big rig with adjustable RF gain etc.and something like a loop antenna. Can we persuade him to do some DXing with something a little more sensitive -weather permitting ? Bill in BC
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx