Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] IBOC vs MDCL
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] IBOC vs MDCL



Patrick Martin wrote:
I have heard that 710 LA has shut off their IBOC for something called
MDCL? Any idea what that is and does it cause sideband hash like IBOC?

MDCL = "Modulation Dependent Carrier Level".  No, it doesn't cause sideband hash; arguably it might be *better* for DXers than ordinary analog AM.


In normal AM, the transmitter must provide enough carrier to support the modulation.  Not enough carrier, and you get distortion -- "overmodulation".

During quiet passages, when the audio is lower, you don't need as much carrier. But traditional transmitters provide that unnecessary extra carrier anyway.

In MDCL, the carrier level depends on the modulation level. When the audio is lower & you don't need as much carrier, you don't provide as much. The energy in that carrier comes from the power supply -- which comes from power provided by the electric utility -- which charges for that power. Use less carrier, and you pay a smaller electric bill. That's the point of MDCL.


Hams who remember something called "Controlled Carrier" may recognize the idea.

It is obviously more complex than regular AM, though with modern software-driven transmitters, maybe not as complex as one might think. From what I read it's also susceptible to being noisier during quiet passages. (when the weaker carrier causes the receiver's AGC to bring up the gain -- and with it any noise)

--

Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View, TN  EM66
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx