Re: [IRCA] MN TA audio 0n 783 at 0215 UTC who?

[George Sherman <georgesmn@xxxxxxxxx>]

Carrier was noted still 0530 UTC bur don't know if from same station. Checked 4845 evening & hard to be positive with WWCR on 4840, but 4845 seemed not there. There were over 60 TA carriers last night but only a few had audio. Thanks. 73, George S., MN


From: Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 11:53 PM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] MN TA audio 0n 783 at 0215 UTC who?

1215.0000 and 1268.9992 are the carriers heard here at 0430UT; 1215 
is the beefier but still quite weak.

782.9998 shows an occasional trace here, George, but only using 
Spectran to "see" it.  I believe your times are too early for 
Mauritania (can any east coaster verify its sign on time?  EMWG says 
0830UT, //4845, and s/off is given as 0100UT), but the carrier might 
be there a lot earlier.    Can you figure out what time it starts to 
fade out?  That might give you an idea of where the transmitter could be.

best wishes,

Nick

At 03:23 13-10-11, you wrote:
>Here in Victoria, I can see 1215 with a weak carrier.  Nothing else on the
>frequencies below.....Walt
>
>On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:29 AM, George Sherman <georgesmn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Lots of splash from WBBM, even in USB. Definite talking. Might it be
> > anything that has a parallel? Also weak audio on 549 & not sure if I detect
> > threshold audio on 747. Carriers on 621, 1008, 999, 1206, 1215, 
> 1251, 1278 &
> > many more, most just weak or weaker. R&% & 8" Quantum loop. Thanks for any
> > thoughts on what 783 might be.
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
>the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx