[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[IRCA] WXYG vs. KWMT vs. CBK vs. XEWA
- Subject: [IRCA] WXYG vs. KWMT vs. CBK vs. XEWA
- From: Rick Dau <drummer1965usa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
I hadn't even known that WXYG wasn't on the air yet until I opened up my inbox
this morning and saw Paul Walker's original post on 'em.
Some thoughts: I have no idea how the FCC even let a station in mid-Minnesota
on 540 in the first place, when KWMT and CBK are so near and stations on 540 get
out like gangbusters. And I especially can't see how WXYG is able to throw
virtually all of its night power in the direction of Fort Dodge, when they
SHOULD be protecting KWMT at night.
Regarding XEWA, I haven't heard them ONCE since starting a new logbook at my
South Omaha QTH this past September. At night it's CBK when the Quantum loop is
pointed NW-SE and KWMT when it's 90 degrees from that.
KWMT gets out amazingly well to the south -- Glenn Hauser sez he hears them
daytimes 365 days a year in northern Oklahoma. But, to the north, it's a
totally different story. When I drove to Winnipeg in August 2008, KWMT was
still there, albeit not real strong, in Redwood Falls, Minnesota. By the time I
got to Fargo, however, it was all CBK.
Once upon a time (say, early 1960s and before), KWMT held the honor of having
the largest daytime coverage of any AM station in the U.S. Nowadays, I'd put
them 3rd behind both KFYR-550 (whose terrestrial signal I was listening to
through most of this morning for their coverage on the flooding in Minot) and
WNAX-570.
And CBK easily gets the honor of largest dayime coverage of any AM station in
North America.
73,
Rick Dau
South Omaha, Nebraska
________________________________
From: Earl Higgins <earlthenut@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Mon, June 27, 2011 10:41:27 AM
Subject: Re: [NRC-AM] WXYG 540 Sauk Rapids, MN
That nighttime pattern surprises me, but I forgot Fort Dodge isn't entitled to
nighttime protection. Ouch, that's got to be quite a clash in KWMT's secondary
coverage areas (Storm Lake, Ames), especially since they ALSO null to the north.
2011/6/27 Doug Smith <w9wi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>The daytime pattern has lobes roughly due east (larger) and west (smaller).
> Looks like there's a null, though not particularly deep, in the direction
>of Saskatchewan. (where the monster signal of CBK is on 540) There's another
>daytime null due south, probably for KWMT.
>
>The nighttime pattern is a circle, tangential to the transmitter site and
>radiating everything south-southwest. KWMT is a Class D station, not
>entitled to nighttime protection -- it looks like nearly all the protection is
>to the Canadian border.
>
>I would imagine WXYG causes considerable interference to CBK in areas in the
>U.S. that used to get a decent CBK signal. These days, Canadian stations
>are not entitled to interference protection outside Canada. (and vice-versa;
>Canada can license stations that would interfere with U.S. operations, as
>long as all the interference happens in Canada. In practice this hasn't been
>happening on AM but there are plenty of examples on FM.)
>
>I'm sure WXYG would not exist if we were still protecting the signals of
>Canadian stations in the U.S..
>
>--
>
>Doug Smith W9WI
>Pleasant View, TN EM66
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx