Re: [IRCA] OFF TOPIC: Honolulu Band Scan
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] OFF TOPIC: Honolulu Band Scan

KORL is currently the calls on 101.1 in the Honolulu market. They are also
the calls on an off air 330W Day/140 W night facility at 1180Khz

Paul


On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Mike Sanburn <mikesanburn@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

>
> Thanks for the nice bandscan from Honolulu! Quite a few call changes and
> frequency swaps from how I remember it. I too logged KORL here back in the
> day. 'Wish I were there right now. ms
>
> > From: gsantull@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 13:36:53 -0400
> > Subject: Re: [IRCA] OFF TOPIC:  Honolulu Band Scan
> >
> >
> > April 9, 2011
> >
> > Mixing business with pleasure. Playing with the Kia Sedona rental car
> radio, while waiting for someone to come and meet me resulted in "expected"
> stations. Was amazed that the only other island AMer heard was from nearby
> Lihue, Kaui. I remember one time I was in Honolulu and could hear the West
> Coast stations during Hawaii daytime. Think car radios were better in those
> days, at least they had external antennas! Could be crappy Sedona AM section
> of the radio.
> >
> > Here is what I heard. Asterisk is the "assumed" station calls, since many
> didn't give them, preferring AM 650 etc. All were from Honolulu or Oahu with
> the exception of KUAI/720 from Eleele, Kauai.
> > Keep in mind this is not a scientific "bandscan", just what I heard
> sitting in my car at Ala Moana Park, Honolulu. No sign of KORL, wherever
> they are. I was trying to hear the calls, a nostalgic listen since it was my
> only Hawaiian station ever heard from Mainland, from New Jersey in the 60's
> and later from California in the 70's. Thought they were on some frequency,
> but did not hear them. The Star Advertiser newspaper did not list radio
> stations as they once did.
> >
> > 590        KSSK     Oldies
> > 650        KRTR     Oldies
> > 690        KHNR     News/Talk
> > 720        KUAI      Mix of Hawaiian, AC and CW, very weak.
> > 760        KGU       Bloomberg Financial
> > 830        KHVH     Talk
> > 880        KHCM    Chinese?
> > 940        KKNE      AM 940, Hawaiian mx
> > 990        KIKI       Hawaiian mx and some talk
> > 1040      KLHT      Religious
> > 1080      KWAI     IRN news
> > 1130      KPHI      Spanish?
> > 1210      KZOO     Japanese
> > 1270      KNDI      Pacific Nations (Filipino, Vietnamese etc)
> > 1370      KUPA     Fox Sports
> > 1420      KKEA     University of Hawaii Sports
> > 1460      KHRA     Hawaiian
> > 1500      KHKA     Sports
> > 1540      KREA     Korean
> >
> > George A. Santulli
> > Lovettsville, VA but on the road in Honolulu
> >
> > > Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 06:48:53 -0700
> > > From: wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx
> > > To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [IRCA] Working on the problem
> > >
> > > Using the two loops on the same frame will degrade the performance for
> the MW portion and probably the SW portion as well. This is because the
> proximity of the windings pretty much ensures that each will 'see' the other
> and therefore the resulting patterns will be somewhat skewed and the nulls
> likely reduced.
> > >
> > > I've used two air core MW loops in my basement shack - one 4' the other
> 2' for over 20 years and found that I needed to keep them about 4' apart in
> order to minimize unwanted interaction.
> > >
> > >
> > > Russ Edmunds
> > > 15 mi NNW of Philadelphia
> > > Grid FN20id
> > > <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > FM: Yamaha T-80 & Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15'; Grundig G8
> > > AM:  Modified Sony ICF 2010's barefoot
> > >
> > >
> > > --- On Sun, 4/10/11, Tim Hills <thills@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Tim Hills <thills@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Subject: [IRCA] Working on the problem
> > > > To: Shortwave-SWL-Antenna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> Hard-Core-DX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Mailing list for the International Radio
> Club of America" <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Date: Sunday, April 10, 2011, 1:21 AM
> > > > Thunderstorms moving through tonight.
> > > > Thought I'd jot down what I've learned and see if anyone has
> > > > any thoughts on improvements or something else I might try,
> > > > other than moving....
> > > >
> > > > I've been experimenting a bit with pulling usable signals
> > > > out of the RF soup I live in and thought I'd share some of
> > > > what I have found works so far. If you haven't seen my
> > > > earlier posts I have 3 5KW+ MW stations beaming directional
> > > > converging in my back yard and hash from high voltage lines
> > > > 60' from the house. Plus the usual semi-urban noise,
> > > > routers, street lights, etc. Also, my "shack" is in the
> > > > basement in conductive ground and the house has the
> > > > chickenwire reinforced plaster. Small lot and I want to be
> > > > as invisible as possible, everything in the low attic
> > > > preferably. It's a challenge but it's keeping me out of
> > > > mischief and honing skills I haven't used in a couple of
> > > > decades. ;)
> > > >
> > > > Changing both the preamp and loop from an unbalanced to
> > > > balanced design really cut down the power line hash and
> > > > going from JFETs (J310s)  to MOSFETs (3N200s) with
> > > > appropriate changes in biasing on the inputs pretty much
> > > > cured the intermod problems and gives a much wider gain
> > > > control. The BF199 bipolars are the same in the output
> > > > stage. 10mA quiescent collector current gives best results.
> > > >
> > > > Air core and spiral windings seem more immune to the common
> > > > mode noise from the power lines than a solenoid and with a
> > > > tighter null. The lower common mode noise was counter
> > > > intuitive to me but I think the lower distributed
> > > > capacitance. It seems that in high ambient environments
> > > > ferrite rods have their own quirks that I plan on
> > > > investigating later.
> > > >
> > > > Right now I have 2 loops on the same wooden frame. 14 turns
> > > > CT covers the MW band, 4 turns CT covers from 3.5MHz to a
> > > > bit over 10MHz. 4 MVAM109s in series/parallel for remote
> > > > tuning, no pickup loop the signal is taken off the tuned
> > > > loop directly through the very high Z inputs of the preamp.
> > > > It's hung on a covered porch when in use with power, tuning
> > > > and gain controls running through Cat. 6 cable.
> > > >
> > > > Still working on the phased loop array. Better than 20 dB
> > > > front/back ratio so far at 1000 KHz.
> > > >
> > > > No formal logs kept so far but I'm having more fun
> > > > building than listening. Catch a station, go upstairs, turn
> > > > the loop, is it better or worse? I need to get a
> > > > rotator....
> > > >
> > > > When I get something workable by the average homebrewer
> > > > I'll post schematics and pics. When I work out the details
> > > > of the preamp if there's enough interest I'll make kits
> > > > available at cost/actual shipping.
> > > >
> > > > Now, about that twin coax the previous owners had hooked to
> > > > that dish....
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > IRCA mailing list
> > > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > > >
> > > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are
> > > > those of the original contributors and do not necessarily
> > > > reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing
> > > > staff, or officers
> > > >
> > > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > > >
> > > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > IRCA mailing list
> > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > >
> > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > >
> > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > >
> > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx