Re: [IRCA] Testing New SDR software

Subject: Re: [IRCA] Testing New SDR software
From: "Les Rayburn" <les@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 10:59:12 -0600
Organization: High Noon Film
Manuo,
Thanks for the link. However, I’ve searched the site, and cannot find any reference to an assembled version of this receiver being available for purchase. Can you provide a direct URL where an assembled kit can be purchased? 
73,
Les Rayburn, N1LF
From: Mauno Ritola 
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 10:37 AM
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America 
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Testing New SDR software

PMSDR could be one possibility: http://www.iw3aut.altervista.org/
  I think the price was about USD 200 readily assembled two years ago, 
when I last asked. It works now with WRPlus software, which some claim 
to have clearly better audio than Perseus software.

73, Mauno

11.1.2011 3:32, Russ Edmunds kirjoitti:
> Thanks, Nick - I missed that. Not that I'd be able to build it, but good to know for those who can.
>
> Russ Edmunds
> 15 mi NNW of Philadelphia
> Grid FN20id
> <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
> FM: Yamaha T-80&  Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15'; Grundig G8
> AM:  Modified Sony ICF 2010's barefoot
>
>
> --- On Mon, 1/10/11, Nick Hall-Patch<nhp@xxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>
>> From: Nick Hall-Patch<nhp@xxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [IRCA] Testing New SDR software
>> To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America"<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Monday, January 10, 2011, 6:43 PM
>> -- 
>> Nick Hall-Patch
>> Victoria, BC
>>
>>
>> from http://www.wb5rvz.com/sdr/: 
>>
>> Ensemble All-Band RX II
>>
>> The SoftRock RX Ensemble Receiver Kit is essentially the
>> Ensemble RX, but has an
>> extra option allowing the user to build the HF or the LF
>> version of the receiver.
>>
>> In the first option, the Ensemble RX kit provides coverage
>> of ham bands from
>> 160-10m, in four different optional "super bands" (each
>> with underlap and
>> overlap within the parameters of the associated bandpass
>> filter):
>>
>>     1. 160m - Continuous coverage from 1.8 to
>> 2.0 MHz
>>     2. 80m and 40m - Continuous coverage from
>> 3.5 to 7.3 MHz
>>     3. 30m, 20m, and 17m - Continuous
>> coverage from 10.1 to 18.168 MHz
>>     4. 15m, 12m, and 10m - Continuous
>> coverage from 21.0 to 29.7 MHz
>>
>> In the second option, the Ensemble RX II provides coverage
>> of LF frequencies
>> from approximately 160-10m, in four different optional
>> "super bands" (each with
>> underlap and overlap within the parameters of the
>> associated bandpass filter):
>>
>>     1. Band 0: 1000m - Continuous coverage
>> from 180 kHz to 480 kHz
>>     2. Band 1: 500m - Continuous coverage
>> from 400 kHz to 800 kHz
>>     3. Band 2: 250m - Continuous coverage
>> from 800 kHz to 1.6 MHz
>>     4. Band 3: 160m - Continuous coverage
>> from 1.6 MHz to 3.0 MHz
>>
>> ..............................................................
>>
>>
>> Quoting Russ Edmunds<wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>>> Looks like the Softrock 160m version tunes only 1.8 to
>> 2.0 mHz.
>>> Russ Edmunds
>>> 15 mi NNW of Philadelphia 
>>> Grid FN20id
>>> <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> FM: Yamaha T-80&  Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15';
>> Grundig G8
>>> AM:  Modified Sony ICF 2010's barefoot
>>>
>>>
>>> --- On Mon, 1/10/11, Nick Hall-Patch<nhp@xxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>> From: Nick Hall-Patch<nhp@xxxxxxxx>
>>>> Subject: Re: [IRCA] Testing New SDR software
>>>> To: "Mailing list for the International Radio
>> Club of America"
>>> <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Date: Monday, January 10, 2011, 3:00 PM
>>>> If you're willing to do a fair bit of
>>>> work (and learning and experimenting)
>>>> yourself, then I suspect you can SDR for
>> peanuts:
>>>> http://www.wb5rvz.com/sdr/
>>>>
>>>> http://homepages.wightcable.net/~g4zfq/Si570.htm
>>>>
>>>> This is the Softrock kit, versions of which can
>> cover MW
>>>> apparently.  I have no
>>>> experience of these, but the very capable
>> Sdr-radio
>>>> software can run them (no
>>>> cost)....prices under $100 for the hardware
>> kits...when
>>>> available.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> best wishes,
>>>>
>>>> Nick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Nick Hall-Patch
>>>> Victoria, BC
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>> Quoting "HASCALL, DAVID CIV DFAS"<DAVID.HASCALL@xxxxxxxx>:
>>>>
>>>>> Agree - For me $850 may as well be $1000 or
>>>> $2000.  I have never owned
>>>>> an expensive rig for any bands that I DX
>> on.
>>>> Look at the Sony HD Tuner
>>>>> for FM DX'ing.  It competes against tuners
>>>> costing five times as much.
>>>>> I can justify a $70 purchase but not a $400
>> one, just
>>>> to DX the FM band.
>>>>> Plus, I now have a decent tuner for general
>>>> listening.
>>>>> I am hoping that some less expensive SDR
>> units
>>>> eventually come to the
>>>>> marketplace.  And when I mean "less
>> expensive,"
>>>> I'm talking below $250.
>>>>> Obviously since these are not consumerist
>> offerings,
>>>> there is no mass
>>>>> market discounts.  Unless somebody can try
>> to
>>>> mass market these as
>>>>> something like "Tivo for radio" or some
>> other way of
>>>> generating mass
>>>>> interest beyond DX'ers, the prices will
>> probably stay
>>>> above $500.
>>>>> 73,
>>>>> Dave in Indy
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Message: 4
>>>>> Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 11:44:54 -0800 (PST)
>>>>> From: Russ Edmunds<wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> To: Mailing list for the International Radio
>> Club of
>>>> America
>>>>>      <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [IRCA] Testing New SDR
>> software
>>>>> Message-ID:<950067.37414.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain;
>> charset=iso-8859-1
>>>>> Thanks Chuck and Nick, although in the one
>> case, we're
>>>> quibbling over $2
>>>>> <g>.
>>>>>
>>>>> Even so, I have trouble justifying $850
>> though. I
>>>> don't think I've spent
>>>>> that much cumulatively over my years in the
>> hobby,
>>>> considering two
>>>>> HQ-150's and two ICF 2010's. For the record,
>> I bought
>>>> my first HQ-150
>>>>> used in 1969.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Russ Edmunds
>>>>> 15 mi NNW of Philadelphia 
>>>>> Grid FN20id
>>>>> <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> FM: Yamaha T-80&  Onkyo T-450RDS w/
>> APS9B @15';
>>>> Grundig G8
>>>>> AM:? Modified Sony ICF 2010's barefoot
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --- On Sat, 1/8/11, Nick Hall-Patch<nhp@xxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> From: Nick Hall-Patch<nhp@xxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [IRCA] Testing New SDR
>> software
>>>>>> To: "Mailing list for the International
>> Radio
>>>> Club of America"
>>>>> <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Date: Saturday, January 8, 2011, 1:50
>> PM
>>>>>> Excalibur is $850 at Grove,
>>>>>> Russ....http://www.grove-ent.com/excalibur.html???Detailed
>>>>>> review
>>>>>> appeared in DX Monitor just
>> recently...and of
>>>> course, none
>>>>>> of the
>>>>>> analog receivers covered the full BCB
>> either!?
>>>> Mine
>>>>>> cover one channel
>>>>>> at a time, and they need a separate
>> audio
>>>> recorder for that
>>>>>> channel...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A bit more later.???This is an
>> interesting
>>>>>> topic, and I'm surprised
>>>>>> how few comments there have been on
>> Mike's post
>>>> so far.
>>>>>> best wishes,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nick
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At 15:00 08-01-11, you wrote:
>>>>>>> I was ( although I didn't say so )
>> excluding
>>>> the SDR-IQ
>>>>>> completely
>>>>>>> on account of that very big
>> limitation. If
>>>> you want to
>>>>>> cover the
>>>>>>> full BCB, it isn't happening today
>> for under
>>>> a grand so
>>>>>> far as I know.
>>>>>>> Russ Edmunds
>>>>>>> 15 mi NNW of Philadelphia
>>>>>>> Grid FN20id
>>>>>>> <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> FM: Yamaha T-80&  Onkyo
>> T-450RDS w/ APS9B
>>>> @15';
>>>>>> Grundig G8
>>>>>>> AM:? Modified Sony ICF 2010's
>> barefoot
>>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> IRCA mailing list
>>>>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>>>>
>>>>> Opinions expressed in messages on this
>> mailing list
>>>> are those of the original
>>>>> contributors and do not necessarily reflect
>> the
>>>> opinion of the IRCA, its
>>>>> editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>>>>
>>>>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>>>>
>>>>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> IRCA mailing list
>>>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>>>
>>>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing
>> list are
>>>> those of the original contributors and do not
>> necessarily
>>>> reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors,
>> publishing
>>>> staff, or officers
>>>>
>>>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>>>
>>>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>         
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> IRCA mailing list
>>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>>
>>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list
>> are those of the original
>>> contributors and do not necessarily reflect the
>> opinion of the IRCA, its
>>> editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>>
>>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>>
>>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are
>> those of the original contributors and do not necessarily
>> reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing
>> staff, or officers
>>
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Follow-Ups:
- Re: [IRCA] Testing New SDR software
  - From: Mauno Ritola
References:
- Re: [IRCA] Testing New SDR software
  - From: Russ Edmunds
- Re: [IRCA] Testing New SDR software
  - From: Mauno Ritola
Prev by Date: [IRCA] CKKY-830 applies to CRTC to move to 1080
Next by Date: Re: [IRCA] Testing New SDR software
Previous by thread: Re: [IRCA] Testing New SDR software
Next by thread: Re: [IRCA] Testing New SDR software
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread