Re: [IRCA] Darn - need a retraction...

[Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>]

I seem to remember you have an ICF-2010 Michael?    Unfortunately, 
it's a known flaw to find stronger stations bleeding through +/- 25 
kHz on that radio.   It's worse on some than on others...and the fix 
is maybe a little complicated, but I can look it up for you if you like.

best wishes,

Nick


....we'll keep reporting those TAs....so keep an eye on the list!


At 02:12 09/11/2010, you wrote:
> OK, still looking for the first TA. On reviewing the recording I 
> always make, it turns out that local CISL 650 was slopping over and 
> that's what I was hearing. Oh well. There's always tomorrow. I 
> wonder though why CISL was showing up 25 kHz higher than it should be.
>
> I'll try and curb the enthusiasm and review the recording BEFORE I 
> waste bandwidth next time.
>
> Michael
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
> the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx