Re: [IRCA] TP, or not, for 20 October, Victoria, BC

[D1028Gary@xxxxxxx]

Hi Walt,
 
Your antennae probably are working fine. 
 
The period from 1340-1405 was very poor for TP reception here this morning, 
 and it wasn't until around 1425 that a modest rally occurred. Overall 
results  were similar to Nick's, with decent audio only on 594-JOAK, 1134-KBS3 
and a  couple of others.
 
73, Gary 
 
 
In a message dated 10/20/2010 1:38:13 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
canswl@xxxxxxxxx writes:

I'm  thinking that I have a problem with my antennae.  I tried between  
about
13:40 and 14:05 and did not hear any audio at all.  Too bad I  wasn't
listening at 14:16 to confirm things on 1566, since NIck's just a  few km
from me.......Walt

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Nick  Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Was up earlier today, and  had a quick listening session at 1220UT, 
another
> at
> 1340, and  a quick final listen at 1415.   A good morning for sleeping
>  perhaps.
>
>
>
> pretty darn good audio (all of it  understandable by a native speaker, at
> least
>  briefly):
>
> nada
>
>
>
>
>  reasonable audio  at  times during the period (much of it  
understandable by
> a
> native speaker, though often battling  w/splash or noise):
>
> 1287 likely JOHR, very early on
>  1566 came barreling in at 1230 with the Japanese program, and made a  
return
> as
> the strongest signal on the band at  1416UT
>
>
>
> not so reasonable audio, occasional  words or phrases in splash or noise
> could be
> understood by a  native speaker
>
> 747 and 774 were heard earlier with NHK2, later  only HLCA-972 was heard
> briefly
> at this  level
>
>
>
> Burbles in the splatter and noise (if  lucky, language might be guessed at
> by
> cadence of talk, or  parallel established by changes in talk or music) :
>
>   heard around 1415UT; gosh, even 747 and 774 only managed this level at
>  this time.
>
> 612 seemed DU
> 828  JOBB
>
>
>
> Strongish het, no audio (either  undermodulated or ravaged by splatter):
>
> 1475  earlier  on
>
>
>
> best wishes,
>
>  Nick
>
> **********
> Nick Hall-Patch
> Victoria,  BC
> Canada
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing  list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions  expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original  contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA,  its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more  information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message:  irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA  mailing  list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions  expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
original  contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, 
its  editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information:  http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message:  irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx