Re: [IRCA] IRCA ---I--78 --45--#4 Re: 930 CJYQ

[Saul DX <sauldx@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Scott, any thoughts on how that will affect CJYQ's signal?
Saul


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <scott@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" 
<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] IRCA ---I--78 --45--#4 Re: 930 CJYQ


> > They are going from directional to non directional at night.. hence the
> > need
> > to reduce power.. they can't run 25KW Non directional at night and still
> > protect the other stations. They probably sold the land or lost the lease
> > and have to move.
>
> They owned the old transmitter site, but it's been heavily vandalized and
> the towers and ground system have been corroded beyond usability by the
> ocean air.
>
> Newcap tried to move CJYQ to the former site of CHVO 560 in Carbonear,
> west of St. John's, but found that site unusable as well...hence the
> present application to diplex on what (if memory serves) is the VOCM 590
> site.
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx