[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference
- From: Scott Fybush <scott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 10:56:46 -0400
Patrick Martin wrote:
Scott,
Don't we have something in "International" laws to protect CKWX?
That's what I've been trying to explain. There's an international treaty
signed by the US and Canada in 1984, formally known as the "Agreement
Between the Government of the United States of America and the
Government of Canada Relating to the AM Broadcasting Service in the
Medium Frequency Band" and informally known as the "bilateral agreement."
According to that treaty (which has the force of law in both countries),
CKWX is protected from *groundwave* interference on Canadian soil during
daylight hours, and from both skywave and groundwave interference at
night. KPWX puts essentially no groundwave signal into Canada, and they
have measurements to prove that.
The treaty provides *no* protection to CKWX (or any other Canadian class
A station) from skywave interference during critical hours, which is
what's happening here.
It's possible that CKWX could work out some sort of arrangement with
KPWX in private negotiations (like that WNYR/CFTR deal in the seventies
I described in an earlier e-mail), but it doesn't appear to have much
recourse where the laws are concerned.
It may not sound fair, but there are a lot of things in international
broadcasting treaties that don't work out well for individual stations.
s
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx