Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference



> It is, but my thought was that sunrise/sunset enhancement will still be
> there even if they used larger towers.

The height of the towers controls the takeoff angle for the skywave. If I
understand it correctly, the shorter towers give off more high-angle
radiation, which means a shorter distance to the first skip back to
ground. There will still be skywave if they raise the height of the
towers, but it will come off the towers at a lower angle and skip back to
ground at a greater distance...ideally somewhere in central or northern BC
instead of metro Vancouver.

s
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx