[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 10-2
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 10-2
- From: D1028Gary@xxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 20:17:35 EDT
Thanks Chuck,
Your suggestion is appreciated.
I did see several NHK2 loggings on 639 made in Grayland and Masset years
ago, and it does seem like the most likely possibility for a CNR1 co-channel.
I'll review the 5 minute 639 kHz Mix recording again for more clues, and
see if I can make out any Japanese this time. The NHK big guns weren't
especially strong this morning, but they did have stable signals. The 5 kw
Japanese like the 675 and 603 NHK1 Synchros didn't show up, though.
73, Gary
In a message dated 10/2/2010 3:20:41 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
charlesh3@xxxxxxx writes:
Hi Gary:
There are quite a few logs of Japan on 639 from Grayland. Until the
sunspots got so low around 2005, I'd say Japan was the #1 log on 639. Maybe you
have some recordings of the NHK big guns around that time? Perhaps the
announcers can be matched up.
Chuck
> From: D1028Gary@xxxxxxx
> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 17:41:43 -0400
> To: ultralightdx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 10-2
>
> Hello All,
>
> The Chinese TP's were really strong here this morning, and several
> Mainland stations had their strongest audio ever. 981-CNR1 was really
booming
> in on a very noisy frequency (980-CKNW is a daytimer here, and Seattle
> noise from 950 and 1000 doesn't help) for a first-ever Puyallup logging
(the
> station is a regular at Grayland). 621-China (presumed Heilongjiang) had
its
> best audio of the season, and many other second-tier Chinese stations
had
> decent strength. Like Bruce and Tim have already observed, though, this
> morning's TP propagation was pretty selective, and the Japanese stations
> generally didn't share in the increased-strength bonanza.
>
> The most interesting signal of the morning, though, was a persistent
> Asiatic TP co-channel mixing with 639-CNR1 around 1406-- the first time
any
> Asian co-channel had been heard here on 639. The station certainly
wasn't
> Fiji (which was looped out, in this DU-dead zone), and had strength
which
> approached that of CNR1 at times. I made a couple of "headphone
recommended"
> MP3's, but since the Grayland and Masset archives don't show too much
here
> except CNR1, it's a real mystery. Congratulations to Bruce and Tim for
> their loggings of 1170-VOA in the Philippines-- one that I certainly
would
> have checked, if alerted. It should receive due attention tomorrow :-)
>
> The following were received on a C.Crane SWP Slider model (7.5"
> loopstick) inductively coupled to a 9' sided PVC tuned passive loop (in
the back
> yard):
>
> 558 JOCR Kobe, Japan Weak Japanese speech around 1328
> 585 JOPG Kushiro, Japan Poor-fair Japanese talk in and out, 1330
> 594 JOAK Tokyo, Japan Good interview program at 1329, w/ fades
> 603 TP-Mix HLSA pop music and UnID Chinese at good level 1333
> 621 China (presumed Heilongjiang) Best signal of season so far in
> some KPOJ splatter _http://www.mediafire.com/?dcjtuqxybcdy168_
> (http://www.mediafire.com/?dcjtuqxybcdy168)
> 639 CNR1 China Synchros Good Chinese speech w/ fades, 1343
> 639 UnID-TP Mixing with CNR1 at a fair level from 1406-1410, this
> mystery station was heard for the first time ever here. At 1408
> the speech sounded something like CNR1's Chinese-- maybe
> Thai? _http://www.mediafire.com/?nd3tvsthu73m4np_
> (http://www.mediafire.com/?nd3tvsthu73m4np)
> A couple of minutes earlier the mystery station was also
> competing w/ CNR1 _http://www.mediafire.com/?76bd609cy1kudz0_
> (http://www.mediafire.com/?76bd609cy1kudz0)
> 648 VOR Razdolnoye, Russia Very good Chinese program at 1355
> 657 Pyongyang BS N. Korea Loud Korean male shouting at 1337
> 666 JOBK Osaka, Japan Fair-good Japanese talk program at 1341
> 675 VOV Hanoi, Vietnam Fair-good VV news at 1402, no NHK's
> 684 China (presumed) Threshold audio in and out from 1330-1400
> 702+ Korean Central B.S. N. Korean buzzing again in splatter, 1348
> 738 BEL2 Penghu, Taiwan Vibrant Chinese pop music w/ HKLG
> 747 JOIB Sapporo, Japan Good Japanese talk w/ KXL splatter, 1339
> 756 CNR1 China Synchros Very good Chinese speech around 1342
> 774 JOUB Akita, Japan No match for KTTH splatter this morning
> 792 UnID Threshold audio, apparently Chinese, around 1350
> 828 JOBB Osaka, Japan Not especially strong, CC QRM at 1349
> 891 TP-Mix Apparent mix of JOHK and China, fair at 1335
> 918 China (presumed Shandong) Fair-good Chinese talk at 1354
> 936 China (presumed Anhui) Good male-female Chinese dialog 1353
> 972 HLCA Dangjin, S. Korea Fair-good Korean pop music 1351
> 981 CNR1 China Synchros Very strong Chinese (in some splatter)
> for new Puyallup logging at 1345
> _http://www.mediafire.com/?cb1u9f9g4kcqbav_
(http://www.mediafire.com/?cb1u9f9g4kcqbav)
> 1035 China (presumed) Good strength Chinese speech around 1326
> 1044 CRI Jiangsu, China Good strength Japanese external program
> at 1403 _http://www.mediafire.com/?97yz7n0qvl8swgf_
> (http://www.mediafire.com/?97yz7n0qvl8swgf)
> 1053 Korean Jammer Fighting it out with Chinese co-channel 1409
> 1134 TP-Mix Good strength snarl of KBS and CNR1 around 1408
> 1566 HLAZ Jeju, S. Korea Fair Japanese religious program at 1319
> 1575 VOA Ban Rassom, Thailand Poor Asiatic language talk at 1320
>
> 73 and Good DX,
> Gary DeBock
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA,
its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA,
its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx