Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA TP's for 3-24-- 1134-KBS Rules

[Guy Atkins <dx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Gary,

This morning I was also part of the Puyallup Posse, searching for signs of
1575 AFN.

I didn't find any hint of them either, during 1355-1405 and 1455-1505
Perseus recordings of the band. Besides 1134 you mentioned, I also noted
1422 JORF Yokohama doing very well at 1402-1403.

73,

Guy Atkins
Puyallup, WA
http://fivebelow.squarespace.com


----------------------------------------------------

> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:10:16 EDT
> From: D1028Gary@xxxxxxx
> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ultralightdx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA TP's for 3-24-- 1134-KBS Rules
> Message-ID: <35953.b9138da.38dbf5d8@xxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> Hello All,
>
> Like Dennis, I noticed conditions were improved from yesterday,  although
> there still wasn't any further appearance of 1575-AFN under  VOA-Thailand.
>
> Using the 7.5" loopstick Tecsun PL-380 and 7.5' PVC box loop, the
> conditions here pretty closely matched those reported by Dennis, except
> that
> 1134-KBS had a freakishly strong signal around 1350 that was totally
>  unexpected,
> and all alone on the frequency (pretty rare here):
> _http://www.mediafire.com/?tciwimjnwmi_ (
> http://www.mediafire.com/?tciwimjnwmi)  .  The other
> Koreans like 972-HLCA  and 603-HLSA were not booming in like  this, though,
> and
> the Japanese "big guns" and 738-Taiwan were not close to their  October
> levels.
>
> It was an interesting morning because of the blowtorch 1134-KBS signal and
> some audio on 1377-China and the 1386-NHK, along with modest audio on
> 1503-JOUK.
>
> 73, Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA)
>
> Spotting receiver: Modified ICF-2010 (30" loopstick)
> Main receiver:  Modified Tecsun PL-380 (7.5" loopstick)
> 7.5' (side) PVC tuned passive loop (in the back yard)
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx