[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[IRCA] TP for 2 Jan 2010 from Victoria, BC
- Subject: [IRCA] TP for 2 Jan 2010 from Victoria, BC
- From: Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 17:53:56 +0000
Couple of sessions at the dials this morning, once at 1400, and then again at 1550UT. Overall signal levels were definitely better in the earlier period, but of course there was more splatter; most loggings were earlier unless otherwise noted. Signal levels were erratic as usual. Another brief listen at 1615UT yielded JOAK-594 and VoA-1575 at fair levels, but not much else.
For the second morning, I've noted NHK2 signing off at 1550UT; whether that's a temporary change, who knows?
pretty darn good audio, at least briefly (all of it understandable by a native speaker)
594 JOAK at 1407 and 1550UT
774 JOUB earlier
828 JOBB earlier
reasonable audio at times during the period (much of it understandable by a native speaker,
though often battling w/splash or noise):
747 JOIB at 1550UT s/off
1575 likely VoA
not so reasonable audio, occasional words or phrases in splash or noise could be understood by a native speaker
657 N. Korea, rough-edged audio; talk //3320 at 1410UT
666 JOBK //594 at 1415 and 1553UT
873 JOGB mx box at 1552UT
Burbles in the splatter and noise (if lucky, language might be guessed at by cadence of talk, or parallel established by changes in talk or music) :
567 likely JOIK, seemed //594
639 CNR-1 //5030
648 Russia?
936 at 1554; Anhui?
972 big carrier, likely HLCA
1008 JJ inflected talk???
1134 ?
1206 hum and talk 1408UT; likely Yanbian
1377 CNR-1 //5030
Strongish het, no audio (either undermodulated or ravaged by splatter):
1566
best wishes,
Nick
*****************************
Nick Hall-Patch
Victoria, BC
Canada
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx